The largest independent, non-commercial, consumer-oriented resource on the Internet for owners, collectors and enthusiasts of fine wristwatches. Online since 1998. | ||||||||
|
||||||||
|
Feel free to discuss pricing and specific dealers. But 'for sale' postings, commercial solicitation and ads are not allowed. Full archive of all messages is accessible through options in the Search and Preferences features. Privacy, policies and administrivia are covered in the Terms of Use.
For the answer to the NUMBER #1 most frequently asked question here--for details or value of a specific older Omega watch you have--go to: Tell Me About My Omega. | Learn more about How To Include Photos and HTML In Your Postings. | To contact someone with a question not relevant to other readers of the forum, please click on their email address and contact them privately. |
: I was wondering if anyone knows why on the Constellation, the
: bezel does not have Roman numerals for the 3 & 6. Also,
: why does the 4 look like IIII, instead of IV? My wife
: noticed this on her watch. Thank you in advance for any
: information on this subject.
The IIII is common to virtually ALL watches and clocks. There are many stories about why this is that way -- the most likely is that it more visually balances with the VIII on the left side of the dial than IV would have.
On the 3 and 9, often, certain numbers are left off when they visually would not fit well on the watch. With the raised bars at 3 and 9 on the current Constellations, the numbers would have to have been crammed between them -- and probably would not look as nice.
Chronocentric and zOwie site design and contents (c) Copyright 1998-2005, Derek Ziglar; Copyright 2005-2008, Jeffrey M. Stein. All rights reserved. Use of this web site constitutes acceptance of the terms of use. | CONTACT | TERMS OF USE | TRANSLATE |