The largest independent, non-commercial, consumer-oriented resource on the Internet for owners, collectors and enthusiasts of fine wristwatches. Online since 1998. | ||||||||
|
||||||||
|
Feel free to discuss pricing and specific dealers. But 'for sale' postings, commercial solicitation and ads are not allowed. Full archive of all messages is accessible through options in the Search and Preferences features. Privacy, policies and administrivia are covered in the Terms of Use.
For the answer to the NUMBER #1 most frequently asked question here--for details or value of a specific older Omega watch you have--go to: Tell Me About My Omega. | Learn more about How To Include Photos and HTML In Your Postings. | To contact someone with a question not relevant to other readers of the forum, please click on their email address and contact them privately. |
I have the SM w/white face and have it on a leather band. I has that 60s classic Seamaster
look that is cleaner with the hash marks vs.
arabics. IMO the 38mm IWC with the small bezel
and arabics makes it too brash. Also I like the
look of white dial with short sleeves vs. the
all black. Just an unofficial poll of a IWC
forum on another website indicates that the
accuracy is not up to Omega standards. The 120
is a perfect watch and the IWC price would keep
me from going that direction.
Chronocentric and zOwie site design and contents (c) Copyright 1998-2005, Derek Ziglar; Copyright 2005-2008, Jeffrey M. Stein. All rights reserved. Use of this web site constitutes acceptance of the terms of use. | CONTACT | TERMS OF USE | TRANSLATE |