The largest independent, non-commercial, consumer-oriented resource on the Internet for owners, collectors and enthusiasts of fine wristwatches. Online since 1998. | ||||||||
|
||||||||
|
Feel free to discuss pricing and specific dealers. But 'for sale' postings, commercial solicitation and ads are not allowed. Full archive of all messages is accessible through options in the Search and Preferences features. Privacy, policies and administrivia are covered in the Terms of Use.
For the answer to the NUMBER #1 most frequently asked question here--for details or value of a specific older Omega watch you have--go to: Tell Me About My Omega. | Learn more about How To Include Photos and HTML In Your Postings. | To contact someone with a question not relevant to other readers of the forum, please click on their email address and contact them privately. |
Its interesting how taste and impressions differ. I agree with Derek. I find the Bond more conservative, classic and formal then the black which I feel is bolder and sportier by comparison. Oh well.
: The Bond watch is a louder look - the blue is
: bright, and I think that it comes off as
: looking more sporty than the black model.
: Personally, I like the black dial better - I
: think that it's more classic, and will go
: with most anything. That said, if you really
: like that shade of blue, it's hard to beat.
: As for the bracelet, I think that you should go
: by comfort. Try both on and decide which one
: better suits your wrist. IMO, the
: traditional bracelet is nicer looking, and
: looks less "Rolex-like."
: In the end, you should pick what you love,
: since you have to look at it many times per
: day.
: C
Chronocentric and zOwie site design and contents (c) Copyright 1998-2005, Derek Ziglar; Copyright 2005-2008, Jeffrey M. Stein. All rights reserved. Use of this web site constitutes acceptance of the terms of use. | CONTACT | TERMS OF USE | TRANSLATE |