The largest independent, non-commercial, consumer-oriented resource on the Internet for owners, collectors and enthusiasts of fine wristwatches. Online since 1998.
Informational Websites ChronoMaddox -- the legacy of Chuck Maddox OnTheDash -- vintage Heuer website Zowie -- Omega information
Discussion Forums ChronoMaddox Forum Heuer Forum Omega Forum
Counterfeit Watchers ChronoTools Forum ChronoTrader Forum

zOwie Omega Discussion Forum

Opened July 1999, zOwie is the Internet's first and longest running discussion forum dedicated to Omega brand watches.

Feel free to discuss pricing and specific dealers. But 'for sale' postings, commercial solicitation and ads are not allowed. Full archive of all messages is accessible through options in the Search and Preferences features. Privacy, policies and administrivia are covered in the Terms of Use.

For the answer to the NUMBER #1 most frequently asked question here--for details or value of a specific older Omega watch you have--go to: Tell Me About My Omega. Learn more about How To Include Photos and HTML In Your Postings. To contact someone with a question not relevant to other readers of the forum, please click on their email address and contact them privately.

My NIS 0.02 !

Basicaly I do not have much against the Bond model. I think it even has some adventages over the new version, which at least partly were mentioned here.
Although I bought the blk/blk version and generally it suits my personal aesthetic taste more than the Bond version, I could have easyly gone for the Bond version either, except for one thing that whould have prevent me from. This one thing is the skeletonized hands. They are very nice on the aesthetical point of view, but IMHO bad on the practical one.
I think that a sport watch, and divers in particular, should be very readable. I like them to have as much contrast as possible between the hands and the dial. I mean that it would be able to read the time with a glance, not starting looking for the hands every time it's needed to know the time.
As much as I've seen, The skeletonized hands of the Bond model doesn't do it well. OTOH the sword hands of the non Bond versions are fine and highly visible and readable.
If I would have bought my SMP when there still been Bond model only, I may have gone for it, but as long as the collection offers versions with solid sword hands, I'd not buy a Bond model.

Just my opinion.

Rgrds, Baruch.

Current Position
Chronocentric and zOwie site design and contents (c) Copyright 1998-2005, Derek Ziglar; Copyright 2005-2008, Jeffrey M. Stein. All rights reserved. Use of this web site constitutes acceptance of the terms of use. CONTACT | TERMS OF USE | TRANSLATE