The largest independent, non-commercial, consumer-oriented resource on the Internet for owners, collectors and enthusiasts of fine wristwatches. Online since 1998. | ||||||||
|
||||||||
|
Feel free to discuss pricing and specific dealers. But 'for sale' postings, commercial solicitation and ads are not allowed. Full archive of all messages is accessible through options in the Search and Preferences features. Privacy, policies and administrivia are covered in the Terms of Use.
For the answer to the NUMBER #1 most frequently asked question here--for details or value of a specific older Omega watch you have--go to: Tell Me About My Omega. | Learn more about How To Include Photos and HTML In Your Postings. | To contact someone with a question not relevant to other readers of the forum, please click on their email address and contact them privately. |
: Most blurbs you read on the Omega site
: comparing the two types of steel used (Omega
: vs Rolex,) stress the chemical agent
: resistant properties of the Rolex type
: steel, but truth be known, it is harder to
: scratch!
Baloney! The steel used by Omega and Rolex have the EXACT same hardness. See the link below for the specifics.
The only difference in the steels used are that Rolex choses a mix that is slightly more long-term corrosion resistant, while Omega chooses one that is slightly more non-allergenic.
What you may have experienced is that the brushed finish on the Seamaster bracelets makes minor scuffs a bit more obvious than the polished finish that is more commonly on watch bracelets. But that is merely a visual effect of the finish texture--not a difference in the materials.
I also have owned and worn a Rolex for years and find it scratches and scars like anything else.
Chronocentric and zOwie site design and contents (c) Copyright 1998-2005, Derek Ziglar; Copyright 2005-2008, Jeffrey M. Stein. All rights reserved. Use of this web site constitutes acceptance of the terms of use. | CONTACT | TERMS OF USE | TRANSLATE |