The largest independent, non-commercial, consumer-oriented resource on the Internet for owners, collectors and enthusiasts of fine wristwatches. Online since 1998. | ||||||||
|
||||||||
|
Feel free to discuss pricing and specific dealers. But 'for sale' postings, commercial solicitation and ads are not allowed. Full archive of all messages is accessible through options in the Search and Preferences features. Privacy, policies and administrivia are covered in the Terms of Use.
For the answer to the NUMBER #1 most frequently asked question here--for details or value of a specific older Omega watch you have--go to: Tell Me About My Omega. | Learn more about How To Include Photos and HTML In Your Postings. | To contact someone with a question not relevant to other readers of the forum, please click on their email address and contact them privately. |
: Well, there I go taking personal testimony for
: Gospel again, sorry Derek, but a family
: member testified that of his personal
Since it was far from a scientific test or direct comparison, it is pointless to attempt to explain why he thought his Rolex scratched less.
Remember, many Rolex owners are rather defensive of their expensive purchases, so tend to think their watches MUST be better than anything else. Plus, he may have treated his Rolex more carefully, since it was a more expensive watch! Any of a number of things like that could have contributed to his belief that his Rolex was more scratch resistant than his Omega.
I've even had one person write in to me complaining how inferior his Omega was to his Rolex--only to discover that he had unknowingly bought a fake Omega!
Chronocentric and zOwie site design and contents (c) Copyright 1998-2005, Derek Ziglar; Copyright 2005-2008, Jeffrey M. Stein. All rights reserved. Use of this web site constitutes acceptance of the terms of use. | CONTACT | TERMS OF USE | TRANSLATE |