The largest independent, non-commercial, consumer-oriented resource on the Internet for owners, collectors and enthusiasts of fine wristwatches. Online since 1998. | ||||||||
|
||||||||
|
Feel free to discuss pricing and specific dealers. But 'for sale' postings, commercial solicitation and ads are not allowed. Full archive of all messages is accessible through options in the Search and Preferences features. Privacy, policies and administrivia are covered in the Terms of Use.
For the answer to the NUMBER #1 most frequently asked question here--for details or value of a specific older Omega watch you have--go to: Tell Me About My Omega. | Learn more about How To Include Photos and HTML In Your Postings. | To contact someone with a question not relevant to other readers of the forum, please click on their email address and contact them privately. |
: it's due to Omegas upward trend. I think we've
That makes sense.
: The MSRP on the new style bracelets is lower
: than the old style bracelets, yet this is
: not reflected in the price of the watch.
I think that was a move to make the bracelets a more viable option as a later purchase. Certainly many Omega owners were appalled to hear quotes of $450 for just a steel bracelet--often half to a third of what they paid for the whole watch!
Brands like Breitling have long made it easy for a dealer to swap a watch between bracelet and strap at time of purchase with no cost penalty to the customer. Likewise, purchasing a bracelet later usually cost no more than it would have buying the watch that way.
But Omega made it so that the watches needed to be sold as they left the factory. Swapping from a strap to a bracelet at time of purchase was at a steep premium over finding the watch already on the bracelet.
Chronocentric and zOwie site design and contents (c) Copyright 1998-2005, Derek Ziglar; Copyright 2005-2008, Jeffrey M. Stein. All rights reserved. Use of this web site constitutes acceptance of the terms of use. | CONTACT | TERMS OF USE | TRANSLATE |