The largest independent, non-commercial, consumer-oriented resource on the Internet for owners, collectors and enthusiasts of fine wristwatches. Online since 1998.
Informational Websites ChronoMaddox -- the legacy of Chuck Maddox OnTheDash -- vintage Heuer website Zowie -- Omega information
Discussion Forums ChronoMaddox Forum Heuer Forum Omega Forum
Counterfeit Watchers ChronoTools Forum ChronoTrader Forum

zOwie Omega Discussion Forum

Opened July 1999, zOwie is the Internet's first and longest running discussion forum dedicated to Omega brand watches.

Feel free to discuss pricing and specific dealers. But 'for sale' postings, commercial solicitation and ads are not allowed. Full archive of all messages is accessible through options in the Search and Preferences features. Privacy, policies and administrivia are covered in the Terms of Use.

For the answer to the NUMBER #1 most frequently asked question here--for details or value of a specific older Omega watch you have--go to: Tell Me About My Omega. Learn more about How To Include Photos and HTML In Your Postings. To contact someone with a question not relevant to other readers of the forum, please click on their email address and contact them privately.

Re: Seamaster second hand
In Response To: Seamaster second hand ()

When I received my Seamaster (it was a gift), I noticed that it was the quartz model. I was happy to have it, but when asked if it was the one I wanted I had to say, "No I wanted the automatic (2531.80)". We sent it back and the store ordered the correct watch.

In the mean time, I noticed that the second hand on the quartz model did not jump the same distance each time. This doesn't mean it isn't accurate, in fact, the quartz is actually more acutate than the automatic. It did bother me that the second hand did this though. I think the irratic movement of the quartz second hand is because the distance the quartz crystal expands and contracts isn't always the same (just a wild guess).

The automatic second hand has a smooth sweep motion which I like much better. Also, I just like the fact that inside my watch are finely crafted parts all working together to tell me the time!

: I have posted this message on the timezone BB before and am
: trying to see if I can get some more comments here.

: I recently purchased a mid-size Omega Seamaster quartz. I love
: the watch. One thing I noticed though is that the second
: hand does not align perfectly with the tick marks as it
: moves. I have been paying extra attention to the close-up
: scans of quartz Seamasters and noticed that some of them
: have the same problem (if indeed it is a problem). My
: question is: are they suppose to line-up? Having paid over
: 1k for a watch I expected it to be VERY precise, or I am
: just too picky?

: Any comments is appreciated. Thanks in advance.

Messages In This Thread

Seamaster second hand
Alignment of jump hands...
Re: Seamaster second hand
Current Position
Chronocentric and zOwie site design and contents (c) Copyright 1998-2005, Derek Ziglar; Copyright 2005-2008, Jeffrey M. Stein. All rights reserved. Use of this web site constitutes acceptance of the terms of use. CONTACT | TERMS OF USE | TRANSLATE