The largest independent, non-commercial, consumer-oriented resource on the Internet for owners, collectors and enthusiasts of fine wristwatches. Online since 1998.
Informational Websites ChronoMaddox -- the legacy of Chuck Maddox OnTheDash -- vintage Heuer website Zowie -- Omega information
Discussion Forums ChronoMaddox Forum Heuer Forum Omega Forum
Counterfeit Watchers ChronoTools Forum ChronoTrader Forum

zOwie Omega Discussion Forum

Opened July 1999, zOwie is the Internet's first and longest running discussion forum dedicated to Omega brand watches.

Feel free to discuss pricing and specific dealers. But 'for sale' postings, commercial solicitation and ads are not allowed. Full archive of all messages is accessible through options in the Search and Preferences features. Privacy, policies and administrivia are covered in the Terms of Use.

For the answer to the NUMBER #1 most frequently asked question here--for details or value of a specific older Omega watch you have--go to: Tell Me About My Omega. Learn more about How To Include Photos and HTML In Your Postings. To contact someone with a question not relevant to other readers of the forum, please click on their email address and contact them privately.

Quartz, but you have a choice.
In Response To: Poll: Automatic vs. Quartz ()

: I've been debating with myself upon whether an
: automatic Seamaster is better than a Quartz,
: and vice-versa. I've come to the conclusion
: that an automatic it better because it gives
: you that more genuine Swiss Made feeling,
: while a watch with a battery in it looka
: like a Swiss watch on the outside, but to
: you it feels like a cheap Casio that you can
: get a the drug store for $19.99. I'm sure
: there are more people who feel like this on
: this forum, and those who are opposed, so
: I'm making a poll on what you guys think is
: better: an automatic Seamaster, or a quartz
: Seamaster...

My gut feeling is that those who buy a watch with their hearts will always buy an auto; those who buy with their heads will go quartz.

I've owned the quartz SM Pro for a couple of years now and love it. It's beautiful, rugged, and unlike its mechanical counterpart, accurate to ±2 secs PER MONTH. The price difference was what initially swayed me in the quartz direction but, being a Bond purist, I also wanted to own the _original_ 007 Seamaster. The quartz movement also has one feature over the auto I couldn't live without. I travel a lot and find the ability to change the hour without stopping the watch to be a boon.

Bottom line, you have a choice, but if I had to replace mine, it would be with another quartz.

Current Position
Chronocentric and zOwie site design and contents (c) Copyright 1998-2005, Derek Ziglar; Copyright 2005-2008, Jeffrey M. Stein. All rights reserved. Use of this web site constitutes acceptance of the terms of use. CONTACT | TERMS OF USE | TRANSLATE