The largest independent, non-commercial, consumer-oriented resource on the Internet for owners, collectors and enthusiasts of fine wristwatches. Online since 1998.
Informational Websites ChronoMaddox -- the legacy of Chuck Maddox OnTheDash -- vintage Heuer website Zowie -- Omega information
Discussion Forums ChronoMaddox Forum Heuer Forum Omega Forum
Counterfeit Watchers ChronoTools Forum ChronoTrader Forum

zOwie Omega Discussion Forum

Opened July 1999, zOwie is the Internet's first and longest running discussion forum dedicated to Omega brand watches.

Feel free to discuss pricing and specific dealers. But 'for sale' postings, commercial solicitation and ads are not allowed. Full archive of all messages is accessible through options in the Search and Preferences features. Privacy, policies and administrivia are covered in the Terms of Use.

For the answer to the NUMBER #1 most frequently asked question here--for details or value of a specific older Omega watch you have--go to: Tell Me About My Omega. Learn more about How To Include Photos and HTML In Your Postings. To contact someone with a question not relevant to other readers of the forum, please click on their email address and contact them privately.

"Review" of Speedmaster "Replica"

I've had this watch for about a week now, and I thought I would talk about it.

Other than the dial, hands, and bezel, this watch is the same Speedmaster Professional we all know and love, with the caliber 1861 movement. I received it brand new from A------.

The watch was shipped with links removed to my specification, but apparently A------ and I don't measure the same way, as I had to insert a link, and then I vascillated between the two adjustment holes in the buckle, which is labeled "Omega Speedmaster Professional".

So far it's running within specification; I'd say about +6 seconds a day. I'm still trying the various positions overnight to see if one is better than all of the others. I can tell you already that crown right and crown left are gainers, crown down appears relatively neutral, as well as dial up. I still have dial down to try.

I got the "Replica" (makes it sound fake, no?) because I liked the look of the dial and the hands, with the applied Omega symbol and the 1957-style hands, and now that I've lived with it a week, I still do... but that hour hand can obscure one of the chronograph registers easily. I don't mind too much, though.

As advertised elsewhere, the bracelet is quite comfortable, and the luminous material does indeed shine all night. The dial, while advertized as black, is really a very dark grey. The bezel is stainless in color, with black lettering, and appears to be wider than the standard Speedmaster Professional bezel.

It's also quite heavy, and takes a few days to get used to the weight.

I've had other chronographs before, and they were insufficiently exciting to keep, but this one is definitely a keeper. Once I recover from the purchase price, I'll be getting a leather strap for when I want a different look. (I'll probably just buy the strap from Omega.)

All in all, I am glad I got it. I was worried that I would regret getting this version and not the current Speedmaster Professional with the thin white hands, but other than the occasional register blockage by the hour hand, I don't regret it a bit.

Messages In This Thread

"Review" of Speedmaster "Replica"
Nice review >>
Current Position
Chronocentric and zOwie site design and contents (c) Copyright 1998-2005, Derek Ziglar; Copyright 2005-2008, Jeffrey M. Stein. All rights reserved. Use of this web site constitutes acceptance of the terms of use. CONTACT | TERMS OF USE | TRANSLATE