The largest independent, non-commercial, consumer-oriented resource on the Internet for owners, collectors and enthusiasts of fine wristwatches. Online since 1998.
Informational Websites ChronoMaddox -- the legacy of Chuck Maddox OnTheDash -- vintage Heuer website Zowie -- Omega information
Discussion Forums ChronoMaddox Forum Heuer Forum Omega Forum
Counterfeit Watchers ChronoTools Forum ChronoTrader Forum

zOwie Omega Discussion Forum

Opened July 1999, zOwie is the Internet's first and longest running discussion forum dedicated to Omega brand watches.

Feel free to discuss pricing and specific dealers. But 'for sale' postings, commercial solicitation and ads are not allowed. Full archive of all messages is accessible through options in the Search and Preferences features. Privacy, policies and administrivia are covered in the Terms of Use.

For the answer to the NUMBER #1 most frequently asked question here--for details or value of a specific older Omega watch you have--go to: Tell Me About My Omega. Learn more about How To Include Photos and HTML In Your Postings. To contact someone with a question not relevant to other readers of the forum, please click on their email address and contact them privately.

Re: James Bond's "Choice"??
In Response To: Re: James Bond's "Choice"?? ()

: Well, of course what you say is literally true.
: Advertisers always have the goal of
: associating their product with the good
: feelings you might get from associating with
: someone/something. That's why beer
: commercials advertise "getting the
: girl" while the truth of course is that if you
: drank beer all the time, you'd get a beer gut and you wouldn't. The
: technique is often called
: "Transference", in the advertising
: world. Advertisers often associate their
: products with celebrities, like Tag does
: with Steve McQueen, and Longines with
: Humphrey Bogart, and Audemars Piguet does
: with Jay Z, etc.

: The business that owns the rights to the Bond
: films is family owned and they have used the
: same advertisers for some years now, i.e.,
: Heineken beer, Sony, Ford, of course Omega,
: etc. In most of the cases, they have been
: the same group for more than 20 years now.
: These companies don't actually fund the
: movie or contribute fees, instead they
: provide props for the movie (Ford provides
: the cars, Sony the computers, Omega the
: watches, etc.) and agree to cross promote
: their products with the Bond films, in
: essence, providing extra advertising
: support, for a certain period of time.
: Interestingly enough, it is one of the
: overall most successful
: advertising/promotion campaigns of all time
: and that's why the advertisers keep sticking
: with the Bond films--you'll notice how
: consistent this group is--nobody wants to
: leave.

: So I think the Bond film production team
: deserves some credit because they have a
: loyal group of advertisers who have stuck
: with them so long--they are obviously
: getting their money's worth. Omega is a
: smart company who knows where to put their
: ad dollars. Rolex, of course, is run by a
: charitable trust and therefore has a
: different financial motivation, but they too
: use celebrities to promote their watches.
: Omega has hit on a really good thing and it
: works for them. But I take your point as
: well, of course. Our world has become
: perhaps too commercial--who wants to see
: christmas decorations after labor day?

Current Position
Chronocentric and zOwie site design and contents (c) Copyright 1998-2005, Derek Ziglar; Copyright 2005-2008, Jeffrey M. Stein. All rights reserved. Use of this web site constitutes acceptance of the terms of use. CONTACT | TERMS OF USE | TRANSLATE