The largest independent, non-commercial, consumer-oriented resource on the Internet for owners, collectors and enthusiasts of fine wristwatches. Online since 1998.
Informational Websites ChronoMaddox -- the legacy of Chuck Maddox OnTheDash -- vintage Heuer website Zowie -- Omega information
Discussion Forums ChronoMaddox Forum Heuer Forum Omega Forum
Counterfeit Watchers ChronoTools Forum ChronoTrader Forum

zOwie Omega Discussion Forum

Opened July 1999, zOwie is the Internet's first and longest running discussion forum dedicated to Omega brand watches.

Feel free to discuss pricing and specific dealers. But 'for sale' postings, commercial solicitation and ads are not allowed. Full archive of all messages is accessible through options in the Search and Preferences features. Privacy, policies and administrivia are covered in the Terms of Use.

For the answer to the NUMBER #1 most frequently asked question here--for details or value of a specific older Omega watch you have--go to: Tell Me About My Omega. Learn more about How To Include Photos and HTML In Your Postings. To contact someone with a question not relevant to other readers of the forum, please click on their email address and contact them privately.

The Co-Axial May Be Better Than We Thought... *LINK*

I thought I'd share an interesting thread that I've been participating in over on the watchuseek Omega forum. In all of my years browsing the forums, I never came across a post from anyone who owned an original co-axial caliber 2500A DeVille until last night. As you'll see in the thread below, this gentleman bought one of the first limited edition DeVille co-axial models, and it managed to go 8 years before requiring its first servicing. He admitted that caliber 2500A was "quirky", but Omega is now replacing the movement with caliber 2500C and only charging him for the routine servicing.

Frankly, this really impresses me. First of all, caliber 2500A was known to be problematic, yet this owner managed to get 8 years out of it. If this is the case, then perhaps owners of the newer and better 2500B and 2500C movements can expect equally long service intervals. Also, from a customer service standpoint, I think it's great that Omega is replacing the movement for this gentleman. After all, the movement alone will cost more than he is paying for the servicing. Granted, Omega probably doesn't want to have to deal with any future 2500A problems, but it's still nice to know that Omega is giving him the newest movement at no additional charge.

For those of you who are interested, here is the link to the thread on watchuseek.

Cheers,
John

Messages In This Thread

The Co-Axial May Be Better Than We Thought... *LINK*
Impressive
Another Link With Pictures... *NM* *LINK*
Re: Another Link With Pictures...
Current Position
Chronocentric and zOwie site design and contents (c) Copyright 1998-2005, Derek Ziglar; Copyright 2005-2008, Jeffrey M. Stein. All rights reserved. Use of this web site constitutes acceptance of the terms of use. CONTACT | TERMS OF USE | TRANSLATE