The largest independent, non-commercial, consumer-oriented resource on the Internet for owners, collectors and enthusiasts of fine wristwatches. Online since 1998.
Informational Websites ChronoMaddox -- the legacy of Chuck Maddox OnTheDash -- vintage Heuer website Zowie -- Omega information
Discussion Forums ChronoMaddox Forum Heuer Forum Omega Forum
Counterfeit Watchers ChronoTools Forum ChronoTrader Forum

zOwie Omega Discussion Forum

Opened July 1999, zOwie is the Internet's first and longest running discussion forum dedicated to Omega brand watches.

Feel free to discuss pricing and specific dealers. But 'for sale' postings, commercial solicitation and ads are not allowed. Full archive of all messages is accessible through options in the Search and Preferences features. Privacy, policies and administrivia are covered in the Terms of Use.

For the answer to the NUMBER #1 most frequently asked question here--for details or value of a specific older Omega watch you have--go to: Tell Me About My Omega. Learn more about How To Include Photos and HTML In Your Postings. To contact someone with a question not relevant to other readers of the forum, please click on their email address and contact them privately.

Re: Aqua Terra standard size vs. mid size

: I'm new to Omega watches (and nice timepieces
: in general). I'm planning on buying an Aqua
: Terra (black / stainless steel). However,
: I'm not sure which size to buy. Assuming
: both fit okay, can you share your thoughts
: on: * The mid-size, at 36mm, seems the
: traditional watch size for this style of
: watch (e.g. same size as Rolex DateJust
: etc.). Is that correct or have sizes always
: varied?

I think you're right about that. Diver's watches are usually 'bigger' than dress watches......

: * Is the 39mm size the standard size (as it is
: called in the catalog) for a Seamaster, and
: part of what defines the Aqua Terra as a
: Seamaster rather than a Deville or other
: style / brand?

I don't believe so.... Omega makes several sizes for this watch: 36mm, 39mm, and 42mm labeled 'Mid', 'Standard', and 'XXL/Big Size'. Standard is just the naming scheme.

: * Or is the "standard size" of 39mm
: (without chronograph functions or a moving
: bezel) part of the current trend for big
: watches? Will it therefore be out of fashion
: in a few years?

The current trend is leaning towards bigger watches alright, but I don't think it'll go away soon...... Small watches just look too girlish....:-)

: * Does the standard size just give the watch a
: bit sportier look than the mid-size?

I think it actually gives the watch a dressier appeal. With a larger dial and the same thickness, the 39mm looks thinner and bolder than its smaller cousin.

: Thanks so much,

: Jim

Just a quick note; I've read a lot of reviews on the Aqua Terra (WISes call it AT for short) and the main complaint that gets noticed is the size of the watch. If you're used to diver watches with larger bezels, be aware that since the AT has a slim bezel, the dial of say a 39mm AT, is bigger than the dial of a 42mm divers watch. Therefore, it is necessary to try on the watches first before buying since relying on numbers alone could be 'misleading'. Many people have purchased the 42mm version of the watch and were unexpectedly dissatisfied by the huge look of it. I cannot stress that last suggestion more. Just go to an AD and ask to try on a few watches.... You won't regret it.

Current Position
Chronocentric and zOwie site design and contents (c) Copyright 1998-2005, Derek Ziglar; Copyright 2005-2008, Jeffrey M. Stein. All rights reserved. Use of this web site constitutes acceptance of the terms of use. CONTACT | TERMS OF USE | TRANSLATE