The largest independent, non-commercial, consumer-oriented resource on the Internet for owners, collectors and enthusiasts of fine wristwatches. Online since 1998.
Informational Websites ChronoMaddox -- the legacy of Chuck Maddox OnTheDash -- vintage Heuer website Zowie -- Omega information
Discussion Forums ChronoMaddox Forum Heuer Forum Omega Forum
Counterfeit Watchers ChronoTools Forum ChronoTrader Forum

zOwie Omega Discussion Forum

Opened July 1999, zOwie is the Internet's first and longest running discussion forum dedicated to Omega brand watches.

Feel free to discuss pricing and specific dealers. But 'for sale' postings, commercial solicitation and ads are not allowed. Full archive of all messages is accessible through options in the Search and Preferences features. Privacy, policies and administrivia are covered in the Terms of Use.

For the answer to the NUMBER #1 most frequently asked question here--for details or value of a specific older Omega watch you have--go to: Tell Me About My Omega. Learn more about How To Include Photos and HTML In Your Postings. To contact someone with a question not relevant to other readers of the forum, please click on their email address and contact them privately.

Thanks for the info, Steve...
In Response To: Fake ... *LINKS* *PICS* ()

I figured the movement was a little off...I have a vintage Omega dress watch with a 283, so I knew it was at least a decent movement, if not actually original.

I'll keep an eye out for that bogus caseback in the future.

I forgot to make my own lame acronym...How about WEATHERED?
Wacky
Ebay
Auctions
That
Hopefully
Engineer
Relatively
Entertaining
Discussions
: It's still Wednesday, right?
: Hi Andy, Yep I'm sure it was still Wednesday
: somewhere in the world when you posted :-)

:

:

: Check out this link to a vintage
: Railmaster...does this dial look right to
: you? I've noticed there are
: "stubbies" which tend to indicate
: a fake on some modern Seamasters. Does
: anyone know if the old Railmasters ever had
: minute markers extending below the hour
: markers?? For comparison, check out the
: Chronocentric Seamaster FAQ page at
:
: www.chronocentric.com/omega/seamaster.shtml#railmcomp
: Yep, you are dead right, that is at least a
: bad redial.

:

: There are also a few other
: "tell-Tale" signs. It has a 283
: movement. According to OVI ( Omega Vintage
: Info ) Railmasters only came with 284, 285
: & 286 movements.

: The caseback is marked as a 2652-11 SC, Again,
: according to OVI the 2652 is shown as being
: a Constellation.

: Another HUGE give away in the caseback. See how
: this one is engraved with C & R ? This
: is a personal engraving done after the watch
: left the factory . Exactly this caseback is
: shown on page 51 of the "Japanese
: Seamaster Book" ( possibly in other
: books too ). This is one of the most copied
: casebacks out there. Anytime you see the
: letters "C" & "R" on
: a case back, ignore it. At best the caseback
: is fake, at worst the whole watch.

:

: I have scans of 3 brochures featuring
: railmasters click on the following pics to
: see larger versions.

:

:

: The next one has slightly different hands..

:

: Also Bill Sohne has a mini review of the
: Railmaster on this web page You can
: see a genuine dial there.

: The auctrion is for a pure franken/fake. The
: movement is genuine ( not from a Railmaster
: though), but I wouldn't bet on anything else
: being a genuine Omega part.

:

:

: Thanks!
: Andy
:
: & Thanks to you for posting the link.

: Steve

Messages In This Thread

SWEAT Wednesday *LINK*
Fake ... *LINKS* *PICS*
Thanks for the info, Steve...
Current Position
Chronocentric and zOwie site design and contents (c) Copyright 1998-2005, Derek Ziglar; Copyright 2005-2008, Jeffrey M. Stein. All rights reserved. Use of this web site constitutes acceptance of the terms of use. CONTACT | TERMS OF USE | TRANSLATE