The largest independent, non-commercial, consumer-oriented resource on the Internet for owners, collectors and enthusiasts of fine wristwatches. Online since 1998. | ||||||||
|
||||||||
|
Feel free to discuss pricing and specific dealers. But 'for sale' postings, commercial solicitation and ads are not allowed. Full archive of all messages is accessible through options in the Search and Preferences features. Privacy, policies and administrivia are covered in the Terms of Use.
For the answer to the NUMBER #1 most frequently asked question here--for details or value of a specific older Omega watch you have--go to: Tell Me About My Omega. | Learn more about How To Include Photos and HTML In Your Postings. | To contact someone with a question not relevant to other readers of the forum, please click on their email address and contact them privately. |
: CajunMike
: Thanks for that- makes sense. I suppose it is
: moot in the sense that I will never
: willingly part with the 2254- but it appears
: to be part of the human condition to wish to
: know that what we cherish is also
: objectively valuable. Odd but not unusual, I
: suspect.
Also realize [factor in] that an upgrade to the CoAxial movement will equate to a $900 or so jump in MSRP.
Certainly to some collectors the Co-Axial movement is worth the extra money, but to others, considering the movement does not have a better warrantee nor is certified to a higher standard, it's not necessarily worth the extra expense.
[Not that I care much either way, since it's not a chronograph...]
-- Chuck
Chronocentric and zOwie site design and contents (c) Copyright 1998-2005, Derek Ziglar; Copyright 2005-2008, Jeffrey M. Stein. All rights reserved. Use of this web site constitutes acceptance of the terms of use. | CONTACT | TERMS OF USE | TRANSLATE |