The largest independent, non-commercial, consumer-oriented resource on the Internet for owners, collectors and enthusiasts of fine wristwatches. Online since 1998.
Informational Websites ChronoMaddox -- the legacy of Chuck Maddox OnTheDash -- vintage Heuer website Zowie -- Omega information
Discussion Forums ChronoMaddox Forum Heuer Forum Omega Forum
Counterfeit Watchers ChronoTools Forum ChronoTrader Forum

zOwie Omega Discussion Forum

Opened July 1999, zOwie is the Internet's first and longest running discussion forum dedicated to Omega brand watches.

Feel free to discuss pricing and specific dealers. But 'for sale' postings, commercial solicitation and ads are not allowed. Full archive of all messages is accessible through options in the Search and Preferences features. Privacy, policies and administrivia are covered in the Terms of Use.

For the answer to the NUMBER #1 most frequently asked question here--for details or value of a specific older Omega watch you have--go to: Tell Me About My Omega. Learn more about How To Include Photos and HTML In Your Postings. To contact someone with a question not relevant to other readers of the forum, please click on their email address and contact them privately.

Re: REALLY thinking about vintage SM

: I have been looking at some of the 50s and 60s
: models - no day/date just arabic numerals
: and chevrons... probably with a luminous
: dial.

The luminous paint on dials last only 10 years or so. So do not expect any vintage watch to have functioning luminous markers.

Also, most Seamasters from the 50's and 60's were dress style watches *without* luminous markers anyway. There were a few divers-style models starting in the early 60's that may suit what you are looking for.

: I don't expect this to be a chronometer... but
: I would like to be able to wear around the
: office without fearing it will die on me if
: I bump it accidently on a door or something.

You should be fine. You have to get back further in time before you have to worry about the pre-shockproof watches.

: My question is - what are the significant
: differences in the movements? Were some
: better than others? Were some known for a
: faulty design (e.g. a weak balance or

While some were better than others, those that were faulty seldom survive to today still running!

: And when talking about jewels, I
: know that more is better

INCORRECT! Here is the relevant exerpt from the zOwie Fine Wristwatch FAQ:

Jewels - are elements used in mechanical watches. Usually a very inexpensive form of synthetic ruby, these are used for virtually frictionless pivots or hubs at certain critical places int the watch mechanism. These jewels are worth only pennies and do not add any monetary value to a watch. It is also important to understand that more jewels does not necessarily make a better watch. While too few can certainly be a problem, the exact number needed for optimal performance depends on the specific design and features of the movement. Overall, 17 jewels is the lowest number needed for most standard mechanical watch movements. Others movements that implement different designs, or complications such a chronographs, may use more. But a novice cannot derive useful basis of evaluation or comparison from whether a watch has 17, 21, 25 or more jewels.

Hope that helps. You should be able to find a nice vintage Seamaster to your liking!

Messages In This Thread

REALLY thinking about vintage SM
Re: REALLY thinking about vintage SM
Re: REALLY thinking about vintage SM
Current Position
Chronocentric and zOwie site design and contents (c) Copyright 1998-2005, Derek Ziglar; Copyright 2005-2008, Jeffrey M. Stein. All rights reserved. Use of this web site constitutes acceptance of the terms of use. CONTACT | TERMS OF USE | TRANSLATE