zOwie Omega Discussion Forum

Opened July 1999, zOwie is the Internet's first and longest running discussion forum dedicated to Omega brand watches.

Feel free to discuss pricing and specific dealers. But 'for sale' postings, commercial solicitation and ads are not allowed. Full archive of all messages is accessible through options in the Search and Preferences features. Privacy, policies and administrivia are covered in the Terms of Use.

For the answer to the NUMBER #1 most frequently asked question here--for details or value of a specific older Omega watch you have--go to: Tell Me About My Omega.

Learn more about How To Include Photos and HTML In Your Postings.

To contact someone with a question not relevant to other readers of the forum, please click on their email address and contact them privately.

Forgot your Password? RSS

Return to Index Read Responses

213.30.40.42.01.001 (SMP) vs 2594.52.00 (SMP)

Hi again,

From my previous post you will know that I am looking at purchasing a new Seamaster 300M Chrono diver and that I am uncertain whether to go for the 2594.52.00 or the new 213.30.42.40.01.001. If the 213 had not been COSC rated it would have made the choice easier, I would have probably gone straight for the 2594. However, the 213 is COSC rated so I am finding it hard to choose between them - I think they both look great. So is there anything good or bad about these different models that I need to consider bearing in mind that I want a robust, reliable, sporty looking watch?

Best wishes
Neal

P.S. Assuming neither is fundementally flawed, I intend to visit an AD and try both on before making a final choice.

Messages In This Thread

213.30.40.42.01.001 (SMP) vs 2594.52.00 (SMP)

Re: 213.30.40.42.01.001 (SMP) vs 2594.52.00 (SMP)

Forgot your Password? RSS

Return to Index Read Responses

0 wallclock secs ( 0.09 usr + 0.02 sys = 0.11 CPU)