The largest independent, non-commercial, consumer-oriented resource on the Internet for owners, collectors and enthusiasts of fine wristwatches. Online since 1998.
Informational Websites ChronoMaddox -- the legacy of Chuck Maddox OnTheDash -- vintage Heuer website Zowie -- Omega information
Discussion Forums ChronoMaddox Forum Heuer Forum Omega Forum
Counterfeit Watchers ChronoTools Forum ChronoTrader Forum

zOwie Omega Discussion Forum

Opened July 1999, zOwie is the Internet's first and longest running discussion forum dedicated to Omega brand watches.

Feel free to discuss pricing and specific dealers. But 'for sale' postings, commercial solicitation and ads are not allowed. Full archive of all messages is accessible through options in the Search and Preferences features. Privacy, policies and administrivia are covered in the Terms of Use.

For the answer to the NUMBER #1 most frequently asked question here--for details or value of a specific older Omega watch you have--go to: Tell Me About My Omega. Learn more about How To Include Photos and HTML In Your Postings. To contact someone with a question not relevant to other readers of the forum, please click on their email address and contact them privately.

Re: sub vs smp taste-test
In Response To: sub vs smp taste-test ()

: Is it fair to say then, that the Rolex Sub is
: NO more accurate than the SMP? Is it also
: fair to say that the Sub simply is not worth
: the money you spend on it, in relation to
: the SMP?
:
: Please advise...

It depends on whether or not you think the extra cost of having the Rolex name on your watch is worth it. Many people would gladly pay anything to have the name of the world's most famous watch manufacturer on their watch, either because they want the recognition that goes with it, or because they have the [mistaken] belief that it'll be the best.

Functionally, there is little difference between your average Omega SMP and your average Rolex Sub. The difference therefore comes down to style, cost and brand name. Personally, even if I was stupidly rich I wouldn't buy a Rolex, because the brand gets a certain kind of attention that I wouldn't like. Even though I appreciate nice watches, people who saw me with a Rolex would think "Urgh, look at that poser with his Rolex." or something like that. The fact that I'm only 21 wouldn't help.

My Dad is 55 and has had his Rolex Submariner for 35 years, but because he is old[er], he can get away with it and not be classified as a poser. Nevertheless, his watch gets unwelcome attention. In Central London, you have to be careful wearing a Rolex, since you risk having it ripped off your wrist by a gang of thieves.

The Omega brand, on the other hand, is not well known amongst people who are not that interested in watches. You will only ever get positive attention.

Mark

Current Position
Chronocentric and zOwie site design and contents (c) Copyright 1998-2005, Derek Ziglar; Copyright 2005-2008, Jeffrey M. Stein. All rights reserved. Use of this web site constitutes acceptance of the terms of use. CONTACT | TERMS OF USE | TRANSLATE