The largest independent, non-commercial, consumer-oriented resource on the Internet for owners, collectors and enthusiasts of fine wristwatches. Online since 1998.
Informational Websites ChronoMaddox -- the legacy of Chuck Maddox OnTheDash -- vintage Heuer website Zowie -- Omega information
Discussion Forums ChronoMaddox Forum Heuer Forum Omega Forum
Counterfeit Watchers ChronoTools Forum ChronoTrader Forum
Vintage Heuer Discussion Forum
The place for discussing 1930-1985 Heuer wristwatches, chronographs and dash-mounted timepieces. Online since May 2003.
OnTheDash Home What's New! Price Guide Chronographs Dash Mounted Collection
inconsistent logic to me

Ben's "why it doesn't make sense" logic doesn't really make sense.

For the Newman Rolex (include the $18m one) he has written in the past that style icon / Hollywood royalty X defining the iconic watch for that brand = many times usual price for that watch >> must be a watch collector

Whereas for the Monaco he writes style icon / Hollywood royalty X defining the iconic watch for that brand = many times usual price for that watch >> must not be a watch collector.

It's illogical. If he argues just on the basis of 5/6 watches is less unique then one watch, then I wouldn't challenge that - it's literally true...

Current Position
Chronocentric and zOwie site design and contents (c) Copyright 1998-2005, Derek Ziglar; Copyright 2005-2008, Jeffrey M. Stein. All rights reserved. Use of this web site constitutes acceptance of the terms of use. CONTACT | TERMS OF USE | TRANSLATE