The largest independent, non-commercial, consumer-oriented resource on the Internet for owners, collectors and enthusiasts of fine wristwatches. Online since 1998. | ||||||||
|
||||||||
|
Vintage Heuer Discussion Forum
The place for discussing 1930-1985 Heuer wristwatches, chronographs and dash-mounted timepieces. Online since May 2003. | |||||||
| |||||||
|
recently on ebay i saw a 2446c gmt for a lowish buy it now price. it's already sold so i figured it would be okay to discuss it now?
anyways, it appeared to be almost nos....i mean a bezel with no scratches! really fantastic...the only flaw i saw....and i should say i'm not 100% sure it is a flaw? is the movement, a valjoux 724, wasn't signed heuer/leonidas at all?
here's what i'm curious about....if one had a signed bridge..and was able to put it on this unsigned movement...would it really matter? i mean, all valjoux 724's should be near equal, shouldn't they? did heuer do any modifications, to their's that a generic val 724 wouldn't have?
so what's your take on this issue...if the movement isn't a "heuer" does it ruin the watch....even if you were able to replace the bridge with a signed one? assuming of course that the bridge could be replaced?
in a strange way i'm weary of it...i mean logically it shouldn't matter at all...but this isn't exactly a logical hobby.
as always, thanks for any opinions/insights/etc!
j.h.
Chronocentric and zOwie site design and contents (c) Copyright 1998-2005, Derek Ziglar; Copyright 2005-2008, Jeffrey M. Stein. All rights reserved. Use of this web site constitutes acceptance of the terms of use. | CONTACT | TERMS OF USE | TRANSLATE |