having gone back and reread everything, i'm way off the mark. sorry shaun...my first post i was talking about heuers in general....somehow i didn't pick up on your theory just being the carreras. this is what happens when i skim read, instead of read read.

my second post somehow i forgot the second half of your theory, which is funny because i even cut and pasted it in my first post???.... ignore my posts.....i missed the boat on both somehow.....i'm thinking maybe i need to get more sleep. sorry, now that i'm thinking alot more clearly (took a long nap today)...i think your theory might be true...either way a good general rule of thumb to follow. thanks!!

j.h.