The largest independent, non-commercial, consumer-oriented resource on the Internet for owners, collectors and enthusiasts of fine wristwatches. Online since 1998. | ||||||||
|
||||||||
|
Vintage Heuer Discussion Forum
The place for discussing 1930-1985 Heuer wristwatches, chronographs and dash-mounted timepieces. Online since May 2003. | |||||||
| |||||||
|
There isn't a lot Heuer nor original here.
Dial-no
Hands-no
case-possibly (you'd need to check if a serial number is present)
Crown-possibly-is it signed?
Pushers-probably not
Movement-unlikely. If anything it looks to be a Valjoux 92 but not original Heuer for a number of reasons.
It's not great I'm afraid. Hope you can get your money back....!
Thanks,
Steve
: So, in a moment of over-exuberance, I committed to this purported
: 7734. After careful study (which should've conducted sooner), I
: now have my doubts. I put it to the group for honest evaluation
: - what's going on with this Camaro?
: Firstly, I've never seen another red dial. Secondly, A 7734 should
: have a date, but the seller could have simply mislabeled a 7733.
: More disconcerting: The markers are too broad; the tachy has odd
: little circles where the lume should be, and I can't quite match
: the tachy markers to any other dial I've seen; the hands are
: squared instead of arrows at the end; the subs aren’t inset
: like they should be; and the subdial hands aren’t thin and
: straight.
: The movement and case check out, but I can't get around the issues
: with the dial. Would love to hear the experts' opinions . . .
Chronocentric and zOwie site design and contents (c) Copyright 1998-2005, Derek Ziglar; Copyright 2005-2008, Jeffrey M. Stein. All rights reserved. Use of this web site constitutes acceptance of the terms of use. | CONTACT | TERMS OF USE | TRANSLATE |