The largest independent, non-commercial, consumer-oriented resource on the Internet for owners, collectors and enthusiasts of fine wristwatches. Online since 1998. | ||||||||
|
||||||||
|
Feel free to discuss pricing and specific dealers. But 'for sale' postings, commercial solicitation and ads are not allowed. Full archive of all messages is accessible through options in the Search and Preferences features. Privacy, policies and administrivia are covered in the Terms of Use.
For the answer to the NUMBER #1 most frequently asked question here--for details or value of a specific older Omega watch you have--go to: Tell Me About My Omega. | Learn more about How To Include Photos and HTML In Your Postings. | To contact someone with a question not relevant to other readers of the forum, please click on their email address and contact them privately. |
To me it was an easy choice since I find every Breiling other than the Navitimer to have questionable styling. I find them to be overly decorated, especially in the Chronomat's case, not to mention tacky at times. I think I can say that here since this is an Omega board. Chuck Maddox, in his website, really gets into the subject of Breitling overstyling. I also find the finish on the Omega superior, not to mention the bracelet. I also like the 2892A2 movement in the Omega better than the 2824 in the Breitling. I also don't like the non-glare coating on the top of the crystal in the Breitling because it lends itself to scratching more than a non-coated crystal. I prefer a non-glare coating only on the bottom for a dive watch as in the Seamaster. But what really made my decision easier is that every other guy wears a Breiling.
Chronocentric and zOwie site design and contents (c) Copyright 1998-2005, Derek Ziglar; Copyright 2005-2008, Jeffrey M. Stein. All rights reserved. Use of this web site constitutes acceptance of the terms of use. | CONTACT | TERMS OF USE | TRANSLATE |