The largest independent, non-commercial, consumer-oriented resource on the Internet for owners, collectors and enthusiasts of fine wristwatches. Online since 1998. | ||||||||
|
||||||||
|
Feel free to discuss pricing and specific dealers. But 'for sale' postings, commercial solicitation and ads are not allowed. Full archive of all messages is accessible through options in the Search and Preferences features. Privacy, policies and administrivia are covered in the Terms of Use.
For the answer to the NUMBER #1 most frequently asked question here--for details or value of a specific older Omega watch you have--go to: Tell Me About My Omega. | Learn more about How To Include Photos and HTML In Your Postings. | To contact someone with a question not relevant to other readers of the forum, please click on their email address and contact them privately. |
: I wonder if anyone can tell me about the
: reputation (mechanically, in terms of
: durability, as well as ability to keep time)
: of the older seamasters. The one I am
: looking at buying is from c. 1960.
: Thanks and regards
Hello:
Durability is exceptional, so long as the watch is serviced (or properly restored after lack of service). Accuracy is usually within a second or two a day, in my experience. I have a 1959 Seamaster in stainless, with date and the rice bracelet that is my favourite watch ever. One great thing about an older Seamaster in really good, correct condition is that it quietly commands respect from people who know watches. Everybody with too much money knows to go out and buy a Rolex- a vintage Seamaster is for those who really care about what they own. My advice is- join the club.
Chronocentric and zOwie site design and contents (c) Copyright 1998-2005, Derek Ziglar; Copyright 2005-2008, Jeffrey M. Stein. All rights reserved. Use of this web site constitutes acceptance of the terms of use. | CONTACT | TERMS OF USE | TRANSLATE |