The largest independent, non-commercial, consumer-oriented resource on the Internet for owners, collectors and enthusiasts of fine wristwatches. Online since 1998. | ||||||||
|
||||||||
|
Feel free to discuss pricing and specific dealers. But 'for sale' postings, commercial solicitation and ads are not allowed. Full archive of all messages is accessible through options in the Search and Preferences features. Privacy, policies and administrivia are covered in the Terms of Use.
For the answer to the NUMBER #1 most frequently asked question here--for details or value of a specific older Omega watch you have--go to: Tell Me About My Omega. | Learn more about How To Include Photos and HTML In Your Postings. | To contact someone with a question not relevant to other readers of the forum, please click on their email address and contact them privately. |
hey, what's wrong with seiko. they make a good quality watch too. and i agree with dave. some people just can't and don't want to be bothered. besides it depends on your lifestyle. if you want something that can "take a lickin' and keep on tickin'" then the quartz is your best bet. but if you want something that you have to bother with and has "soul" then of course the auto. whether it's a full size or a mid size depends on your wrist and how it looks in your eyes. i myself chose a mid size quartz because it just looked better on me. the full sized seemed too clunky and big. and for the choice of the quartz well, i too don't want to be bothered and i am rough with my stuff. besides, i hate being late and the quartz gets me there on time. hey, just remember this JAMES BOND'S FIRST CHOICE WAS A QUARTZ! with all the tight situations he's in i'm amazed that his auto kept on working. of course, it's only a movie.
Chronocentric and zOwie site design and contents (c) Copyright 1998-2005, Derek Ziglar; Copyright 2005-2008, Jeffrey M. Stein. All rights reserved. Use of this web site constitutes acceptance of the terms of use. | CONTACT | TERMS OF USE | TRANSLATE |