The largest independent, non-commercial, consumer-oriented resource on the Internet for owners, collectors and enthusiasts of fine wristwatches. Online since 1998. | ||||||||
|
||||||||
|
Feel free to discuss pricing and specific dealers. But 'for sale' postings, commercial solicitation and ads are not allowed. Full archive of all messages is accessible through options in the Search and Preferences features. Privacy, policies and administrivia are covered in the Terms of Use.
For the answer to the NUMBER #1 most frequently asked question here--for details or value of a specific older Omega watch you have--go to: Tell Me About My Omega. | Learn more about How To Include Photos and HTML In Your Postings. | To contact someone with a question not relevant to other readers of the forum, please click on their email address and contact them privately. |
: I just saw a close up of the Seamaster GMT Automatic/black
: rubber strap at local jeweler. This watch looks absolutely
: awesome. I'm own a Seamaster Professional Automatic in
: Stainless which I've had a little over two years. I love
: the watch an wear it every day. But....I may look into the
: new GMT. Does anyone out there own one? This jeweler is an
: authorized dealer and is asking $1875. If anyone can share
: their experience with the GMT, it would be greatly
: appreciated.
Having a little trouble lately with my "150th" and being biased therefore concerning Omega in some issues I would stick with the Seamaster you already own. My 150th shares the same dial indicators and hands your desired GMT features. Those big fat tritium indicators lack IMHO a little bit precision and will overfill the dial. They are really cool at night, but it sort of looks like a lamp on your arm ;-). Rolex indicators for example are much higher precision. Each tritium indicator is framed in a steel frame, looks very clean. That's why their dial looks and sparkels better, but the Seamaster kicks back with the wave design. Also my hands carry fat tritium, which doesn't look so fine like the skeleton hands of the regular Seamaster you already own.
Instead of a GMT I would consider a chronograph, since the GMT essentially doesn't give you a real technical benefit, but on the other side the chronographs are more expensive :-(.
Just my 0.02 cent.
Cheers, Andreas
Chronocentric and zOwie site design and contents (c) Copyright 1998-2005, Derek Ziglar; Copyright 2005-2008, Jeffrey M. Stein. All rights reserved. Use of this web site constitutes acceptance of the terms of use. | CONTACT | TERMS OF USE | TRANSLATE |