The largest independent, non-commercial, consumer-oriented resource on the Internet for owners, collectors and enthusiasts of fine wristwatches. Online since 1998. | ||||||||
|
||||||||
|
Feel free to discuss pricing and specific dealers. But 'for sale' postings, commercial solicitation and ads are not allowed. Full archive of all messages is accessible through options in the Search and Preferences features. Privacy, policies and administrivia are covered in the Terms of Use.
For the answer to the NUMBER #1 most frequently asked question here--for details or value of a specific older Omega watch you have--go to: Tell Me About My Omega. | Learn more about How To Include Photos and HTML In Your Postings. | To contact someone with a question not relevant to other readers of the forum, please click on their email address and contact them privately. |
I was just looking at Seamasters today. I have small wrists and felt that the Seamaster Chronograph was too big for me as an everyday watch. The mid chronograph felt much better. But, I think the watch for me is going to be the Full sized quartz (which is still smaller than the full Chronograph, and costs less too). The mid sized Seamaster just seemed too much like my old tag heuer in terms of size. So for me, I think the tradeoff will be to get the quartz full size...
: I am interested in the Seamaster Pro Diver and wanted t o get
: your opinion on quartz vs. automatic. Fair price difference
: and I was interested in advantages vs. disadvantages of
: each. Also midsize vs. pro size. I have a 7 inch wrist and
: was unsure which to pursue. Is there a substanial weight
: difference?
: Audie
Chronocentric and zOwie site design and contents (c) Copyright 1998-2005, Derek Ziglar; Copyright 2005-2008, Jeffrey M. Stein. All rights reserved. Use of this web site constitutes acceptance of the terms of use. | CONTACT | TERMS OF USE | TRANSLATE |