The largest independent, non-commercial, consumer-oriented resource on the Internet for owners, collectors and enthusiasts of fine wristwatches. Online since 1998. | ||||||||
|
||||||||
|
Feel free to discuss pricing and specific dealers. But 'for sale' postings, commercial solicitation and ads are not allowed. Full archive of all messages is accessible through options in the Search and Preferences features. Privacy, policies and administrivia are covered in the Terms of Use.
For the answer to the NUMBER #1 most frequently asked question here--for details or value of a specific older Omega watch you have--go to: Tell Me About My Omega. | Learn more about How To Include Photos and HTML In Your Postings. | To contact someone with a question not relevant to other readers of the forum, please click on their email address and contact them privately. |
But it also depends on how active you are. I wouldn't wear my automatic to play tennis or football, But I would wear my Quartz to do anything.
: I've been debating with myself upon whether an
: automatic Seamaster is better than a Quartz,
: and vice-versa. I've come to the conclusion
: that an automatic it better because it gives
: you that more genuine Swiss Made feeling,
: while a watch with a battery in it looka
: like a Swiss watch on the outside, but to
: you it feels like a cheap Casio that you can
: get a the drug store for $19.99. I'm sure
: there are more people who feel like this on
: this forum, and those who are opposed, so
: I'm making a poll on what you guys think is
: better: an automatic Seamaster, or a quartz
: Seamaster...
Chronocentric and zOwie site design and contents (c) Copyright 1998-2005, Derek Ziglar; Copyright 2005-2008, Jeffrey M. Stein. All rights reserved. Use of this web site constitutes acceptance of the terms of use. | CONTACT | TERMS OF USE | TRANSLATE |