The largest independent, non-commercial, consumer-oriented resource on the Internet for owners, collectors and enthusiasts of fine wristwatches. Online since 1998. | ||||||||
|
||||||||
|
Feel free to discuss pricing and specific dealers. But 'for sale' postings, commercial solicitation and ads are not allowed. Full archive of all messages is accessible through options in the Search and Preferences features. Privacy, policies and administrivia are covered in the Terms of Use.
For the answer to the NUMBER #1 most frequently asked question here--for details or value of a specific older Omega watch you have--go to: Tell Me About My Omega. | Learn more about How To Include Photos and HTML In Your Postings. | To contact someone with a question not relevant to other readers of the forum, please click on their email address and contact them privately. |
: I agree that is probably true, but if it is
: obvious with my eyes (.5mm = .04 inch = 4
: hundreths). It's still too much because
: right when I saw it, I was uneasy about it.
0.5 mm divided by 25.4 mm/inch = 0.01968 inch = about 2/100ths. You can verify this with the length conversion calculator at: http://www.webcom.com/legacysy/convert2/length.html.
Well, it is up to you whether the difference is enough to bother you.
: Question : in terms of getting the watch
: "fully wound" to test out the
: accuracy and power reserve, is wearing it a
: full day sufficient for testing?
Wearing-time is a bad measure, because people's activity levels and manners of movement are all so different. Best way is to manually wind the watch for about 25-30 turns.
Chronocentric and zOwie site design and contents (c) Copyright 1998-2005, Derek Ziglar; Copyright 2005-2008, Jeffrey M. Stein. All rights reserved. Use of this web site constitutes acceptance of the terms of use. | CONTACT | TERMS OF USE | TRANSLATE |