![]() |
The largest independent, non-commercial, consumer-oriented resource on the Internet for owners, collectors and enthusiasts of fine wristwatches. Online since 1998. | |||||||
|
||||||||
|
Feel free to discuss pricing and specific dealers. But 'for sale' postings, commercial solicitation and ads are not allowed. Full archive of all messages is accessible through options in the Search and Preferences features. Privacy, policies and administrivia are covered in the Terms of Use.
For the answer to the NUMBER #1 most frequently asked question here--for details or value of a specific older Omega watch you have--go to: Tell Me About My Omega. | Learn more about How To Include Photos and HTML In Your Postings. | To contact someone with a question not relevant to other readers of the forum, please click on their email address and contact them privately. |
Hi Langley,
I have the 3513.30.00, so I don't think mine has the same movement (mine's an 1152) but is steel on steel. I also opted for the steel bracelet.
No complaints as far as the movement, accuracy (~ +6 sec/day for most rest positions). My crystal is domed with the AR on the inside only. The bracelet is very comfortable and secure.
Only two things about mine. I won't say I dislike it because of them, only noting them for you:
1) Most folks opt for the classic white hands/black dial. I would think more popular = easier resale if you ever decide to swap it for something else.
2) The silver on silver can be a bit hard to see at times. No big deal, but sometimes I have to really look to check the time.
On the plus side, I think the silver/silver combo is a bit dressier than the white/black, but that's just my opinion.
Ken
Chronocentric and zOwie site design and contents (c) Copyright 1998-2005, Derek Ziglar; Copyright 2005-2008, Jeffrey M. Stein. All rights reserved. Use of this web site constitutes acceptance of the terms of use. | CONTACT | TERMS OF USE | TRANSLATE |