![]() |
The largest independent, non-commercial, consumer-oriented resource on the Internet for owners, collectors and enthusiasts of fine wristwatches. Online since 1998. | |||||||
|
||||||||
|
Feel free to discuss pricing and specific dealers. But 'for sale' postings, commercial solicitation and ads are not allowed. Full archive of all messages is accessible through options in the Search and Preferences features. Privacy, policies and administrivia are covered in the Terms of Use.
For the answer to the NUMBER #1 most frequently asked question here--for details or value of a specific older Omega watch you have--go to: Tell Me About My Omega. | Learn more about How To Include Photos and HTML In Your Postings. | To contact someone with a question not relevant to other readers of the forum, please click on their email address and contact them privately. |
I love the idea.
As I think I told you, Steve, I've got eight of these Omegas that I bought from a watch shop that was going out of business for $50 each. They couldn't sell them. I took one of them out of the box and wear it now and again for gardening, but the others are just sitting in a drawer.
Grail? Who knew?
But seriously. I know little about watch naming conventions, but a little about the English language. Since the project is in its infancy, I add my two cents: How about calling it the "Chuck Maddox Speedmaster?"
I like the four-beat rhythm and internal alliteration. And there's a full-name precedent with the Paul Newman Daytona.
Just a thought, of course, and if for horological (love that word) reasons, calling it the "Maddox" (which I like a lot, too) or "Maddox Speedmaster" is likely to gain wider acceptance, then forget I ever said this and I'll do what ever I can to support it.
best
Allen St. John
Chronocentric and zOwie site design and contents (c) Copyright 1998-2005, Derek Ziglar; Copyright 2005-2008, Jeffrey M. Stein. All rights reserved. Use of this web site constitutes acceptance of the terms of use. | CONTACT | TERMS OF USE | TRANSLATE |