![]() |
The largest independent, non-commercial, consumer-oriented resource on the Internet for owners, collectors and enthusiasts of fine wristwatches. Online since 1998. | |||||||
|
||||||||
|
Feel free to discuss pricing and specific dealers. But 'for sale' postings, commercial solicitation and ads are not allowed. Full archive of all messages is accessible through options in the Search and Preferences features. Privacy, policies and administrivia are covered in the Terms of Use.
For the answer to the NUMBER #1 most frequently asked question here--for details or value of a specific older Omega watch you have--go to: Tell Me About My Omega. | Learn more about How To Include Photos and HTML In Your Postings. | To contact someone with a question not relevant to other readers of the forum, please click on their email address and contact them privately. |
: How about posting a pic of a F300 for comparsion?
: Jim
So I got the batteries changed in my two F300Hz watches.
So for comparison for those of you who missed last week's post, here is a 8 beats per second 28,800 chronograph hand
in a one second exposure.
Now here is a F300Hz Speedsonic in a one second exposure
And here is a half second exposure
Closer
Even closer
There is no comparison. The F300Hz is far and away the smoothest sweep second hand.
My other F300Hz in a one second exposure:
and in a half second exposure
I found that shorter exposures basically stopped the hand and you could not "see" any motion
Here is a 1/4 second exposure
Sam aka Hewybaby
Chronocentric and zOwie site design and contents (c) Copyright 1998-2005, Derek Ziglar; Copyright 2005-2008, Jeffrey M. Stein. All rights reserved. Use of this web site constitutes acceptance of the terms of use. | CONTACT | TERMS OF USE | TRANSLATE |