The largest independent, non-commercial, consumer-oriented resource on the Internet for owners, collectors and enthusiasts of fine wristwatches. Online since 1998. | ||||||||
|
||||||||
|
Feel free to discuss pricing and specific dealers. But 'for sale' postings, commercial solicitation and ads are not allowed. Full archive of all messages is accessible through options in the Search and Preferences features. Privacy, policies and administrivia are covered in the Terms of Use.
For the answer to the NUMBER #1 most frequently asked question here--for details or value of a specific older Omega watch you have--go to: Tell Me About My Omega. | Learn more about How To Include Photos and HTML In Your Postings. | To contact someone with a question not relevant to other readers of the forum, please click on their email address and contact them privately. |
Fair point Michael, but I think what is meant is that some watches sit unused in jewellers shops for some time.
In my case, my 30th aniversary Speedmaster, which is NOT COSC certified, was manufactured in 1999 and I purchased it in 2001. It definately benefited from a few days of use and is currently 6 seconds fast over the past 7 days.
Should be certified really......
Kieron
: Guys I don't understand all your accuracy
: issues about "Break in Period"?
: These watches after the movement has been
: assembled goes and pasts a supposedly
: rigorous COSC certification. So why should
: it not be accurate as specified right out of
: the box? (-4 / +6 sec a day)
: None of your discussions make sense about any
: "break in period" because than the
: watch would of never have passed the COSC?
: or what are we suppose to resend our watches
: to do this test?
Chronocentric and zOwie site design and contents (c) Copyright 1998-2005, Derek Ziglar; Copyright 2005-2008, Jeffrey M. Stein. All rights reserved. Use of this web site constitutes acceptance of the terms of use. | CONTACT | TERMS OF USE | TRANSLATE |