The largest independent, non-commercial, consumer-oriented resource on the Internet for owners, collectors and enthusiasts of fine wristwatches. Online since 1998. | ||||||||
|
||||||||
|
Feel free to discuss pricing and specific dealers. But 'for sale' postings, commercial solicitation and ads are not allowed. Full archive of all messages is accessible through options in the Search and Preferences features. Privacy, policies and administrivia are covered in the Terms of Use.
For the answer to the NUMBER #1 most frequently asked question here--for details or value of a specific older Omega watch you have--go to: Tell Me About My Omega. | Learn more about How To Include Photos and HTML In Your Postings. | To contact someone with a question not relevant to other readers of the forum, please click on their email address and contact them privately. |
It has nothing to do with telling time or something being worth the money. A $30 Timex is more accurate.
It's really about taste, your self image and your financial resources. I would love a Sub, SeaDweller or an Explorer II, but I can't reconcile the extra expense vs what I would get at this point in my life.
You can also buy $25,000 Pateks which may be less accurate than an SMP. In the rarefied fine watch arena opinions are as much (or more) subjective as they are objective.
: Is it fair to say then, that the Rolex Sub is
: NO more accurate than the SMP? Is it also
: fair to say that the Sub simply is not worth
: the money you spend on it, in relation to
: the SMP?
: Please advise...
Chronocentric and zOwie site design and contents (c) Copyright 1998-2005, Derek Ziglar; Copyright 2005-2008, Jeffrey M. Stein. All rights reserved. Use of this web site constitutes acceptance of the terms of use. | CONTACT | TERMS OF USE | TRANSLATE |