The largest independent, non-commercial, consumer-oriented resource on the Internet for owners, collectors and enthusiasts of fine wristwatches. Online since 1998.
Informational Websites ChronoMaddox -- the legacy of Chuck Maddox OnTheDash -- vintage Heuer website Zowie -- Omega information
Discussion Forums ChronoMaddox Forum Heuer Forum Omega Forum
Counterfeit Watchers ChronoTools Forum ChronoTrader Forum

zOwie Omega Discussion Forum

Opened July 1999, zOwie is the Internet's first and longest running discussion forum dedicated to Omega brand watches.

Feel free to discuss pricing and specific dealers. But 'for sale' postings, commercial solicitation and ads are not allowed. Full archive of all messages is accessible through options in the Search and Preferences features. Privacy, policies and administrivia are covered in the Terms of Use.

For the answer to the NUMBER #1 most frequently asked question here--for details or value of a specific older Omega watch you have--go to: Tell Me About My Omega. Learn more about How To Include Photos and HTML In Your Postings. To contact someone with a question not relevant to other readers of the forum, please click on their email address and contact them privately.

Re: Something to say
In Response To: Something to say ()

Hi Georges. Thank you for getting into the discussion.

: The coaxial is too young to be judged reliable

The co-axial escapement has been in handmade, very high end, watches for a number of years. But I agree with you that this technology will have to prove itself in production over a period of time.

: Never underestimate the rolex brand

I agree. A person would be foolish to underestimate the Rolex 'brand'. I also believe Rolex has some real substance behind their killer brand. My point was not to knock Rolex, but to point out that the configuration of Rolex's business, i.e. self-contained manufacturer, is not the business model that made the world famous Swiss watch industry what it became. In many ways the Rolex model, as it turns out, has served Rolex extremely well. I just wanted to point out that while we may have a tendency to laud the Rolex business model, it is not the model that got watches to the high technical level they enjoy today.

: you may not like it that is fine, but it is
: still the leader in its category

I don't dislike Rolex. Emotionally, I'm neutral on them. I have seen a few Rolex watches I thought were attractive, but overall I'm just not drawn to the Rolex aesthetic. This a very personal thing and I would not, and could not, criticize someone else who is. As to their quality, clearly they have some excellent quality behind most of their watches. I also agree with you that no one can deny Rolex their position as sales leader in their category. That is a business accomplishment they can be justly proud of.

Georges, while lurking here for a while I have enjoyed reading your posts very much. You have a lot of knowledge and a pleasant way of sharing it. I've really benefitted from your input. Geo

Current Position
Chronocentric and zOwie site design and contents (c) Copyright 1998-2005, Derek Ziglar; Copyright 2005-2008, Jeffrey M. Stein. All rights reserved. Use of this web site constitutes acceptance of the terms of use. CONTACT | TERMS OF USE | TRANSLATE