zOwie Omega Discussion Forum

Opened July 1999, zOwie is the Internet's first and longest running discussion forum dedicated to Omega brand watches.

Feel free to discuss pricing and specific dealers. But 'for sale' postings, commercial solicitation and ads are not allowed. Full archive of all messages is accessible through options in the Search and Preferences features. Privacy, policies and administrivia are covered in the Terms of Use.

For the answer to the NUMBER #1 most frequently asked question here--for details or value of a specific older Omega watch you have--go to: Tell Me About My Omega.

Learn more about How To Include Photos and HTML In Your Postings.

To contact someone with a question not relevant to other readers of the forum, please click on their email address and contact them privately.

Forgot your Password? RSS

Return to Index Read Responses

right , omega wrote me stating 2% at most . nt

In Response To: Re: POWER RESERVE ()

: You are correct that:
: 1. The laws of physics state that the more mass
: moved, the more energy required.
: 2. Behavior of complex mechanisms do not always
: follow that rule in simply observable
: manner.

: In the practical application here, whatever
: additional physical energy is required to
: run the chronograph appears to be either
: extremely nominal or tapping energy that
: would have been expended by the operation of
: the movement anyway.

: So the net effect is that you are unlikely to
: notice any appreciable difference in the
: power reserve with the chronograph running.

Messages In This Thread

POWER RESERVE

Re: POWER RESERVE

right , omega wrote me stating 2% at most . nt

Forgot your Password? RSS

Return to Index Read Responses

0 wallclock secs ( 0.17 usr + 0.04 sys = 0.21 CPU)