|The largest independent, non-commercial, consumer-oriented resource on the Internet for owners, collectors and enthusiasts of fine wristwatches. Online since 1998.|
|For the answer to the NUMBER #1 most frequently asked question here--for details or value of a specific older Omega watch you have--go to: Tell Me About My Omega.||Learn more about How To Include Photos and HTML In Your Postings.||To contact someone with a question not relevant to other readers of the forum, please click on their email address and contact them privately.|
Some 176.001 Info *PICS* *LINK* Posted By: SteveW62
In Response To: How about "WHOOPS: eBay"? (Chicagoland Chuck Maddox) Hi Chuck, cool auction !
Hi Chuck, cool auction !
I'm afraid I'll have to "sit on the fence" about the watch itself. I have never seen a speedmaster MK III in THAT case in ANY of the period literature that I have seen.
Hi Steve! How do you like my suggestion for an acronym for this weekly event?
This [Mark III] example seems VERY similar to me...
I don't have a copy of SAGA in front of me, but I'm really still undecided about these watches and whther they are just redialed Seamasters ( a small theory here... A Seamaster is designed to get wet, many some of them have got water damaged & the Speedy MK III dial was the cheapest/easiest dial to get/fit ? )
I really don't know [or believe] that the Seamasters of this era were really all that more water resistant than the Speedmasters of that era.
Maybe this question will be answered in Marco's new book.
I hope Marco's book answers a lot of questions!
But what REALLY woke me up about this auction is coming below....
I do have some concrete info on the 176.001.
I think it was an experimental watch ( prototype if you like that was never manufactured for end customers.
Looking through my "archived" pics on my PC I found this. I'll freely admit, I have no Idea where I got it from. It either came directly from the Museum themselves as a reply to a query , or someone that I know with a 1971 dealers catalogue sent me this scan.
I would tip on the Museum.
Here's the Pic...
Some points (no Particular order ).
I'd bet this was a prototype that never got far & the case backs that were made up in advance for this model, were restamped by Omega themselves & used on the replacement model.
That's possible, however, the caseback of the example which is on eBay doesn't look, to me, that it was done with the care Omega might use. It looks more like "Home work" as John Diethelm was known to say.
I'd like to know if any watches "escaped" from the factory in the (theoritical) 5 months that the watch could have been on the market...... ( enough "Iffy" words in there ?
PLEASE, If anyone sees a watch looking like this, contact me.
Contact me first! [Just kidding!] Contact us both.
Chuck, could I please ask you to add this scan to your Excellent Dimensions of Selected Omega Chronograph webpage? I use that a LOT. Not neccessarily for the dimensions, just for a handy way of finding a picture.
Sure... Just tell me which catagory it belongs in! For I don't know!
A great Auction find Chuck. Thanks !
Thank you Steve for a great idea for Wednesdays!