The largest independent, non-commercial, consumer-oriented resource on the Internet for owners, collectors and enthusiasts of fine wristwatches. Online since 1998.
Informational Websites ChronoMaddox -- the legacy of Chuck Maddox OnTheDash -- vintage Heuer website Zowie -- Omega information
Discussion Forums ChronoMaddox Forum Heuer Forum Omega Forum
Counterfeit Watchers ChronoTools Forum ChronoTrader Forum

zOwie Omega Discussion Forum

Opened July 1999, zOwie is the Internet's first and longest running discussion forum dedicated to Omega brand watches.

Feel free to discuss pricing and specific dealers. But 'for sale' postings, commercial solicitation and ads are not allowed. Full archive of all messages is accessible through options in the Search and Preferences features. Privacy, policies and administrivia are covered in the Terms of Use.

For the answer to the NUMBER #1 most frequently asked question here--for details or value of a specific older Omega watch you have--go to: Tell Me About My Omega. Learn more about How To Include Photos and HTML In Your Postings. To contact someone with a question not relevant to other readers of the forum, please click on their email address and contact them privately.

Some thoughts, some portals...
In Response To: Speedy Mark IV Questions... ()

Speedy Mark IV Questions... Posted By: JohnK Date: 5/9/07 15:02 GMT

So...I have just had a Speedy Mark IV arrive and I a couple of questions...

Why does it say 1040 instead of 1041

Why do you think that the movement should say 1041? They never shipped that way...
OMark Series Article: Omega Speedmaster Professional Mark IV (1973):

Please note the first sentence of the third paragraph after the picture caption.
Dimensions of Selected Omega Chronographs:

Please note the Calibre column on line 3 of the Mark Series chart.
Marco Richon's History of the Omega Speedmaster Tables:

Please note that while both the Mark IV and the Speedmaster 125 were introduced in 1973, onlt the 125 sported the c.1041 movement. In fact, the Speedmaster 125 was the only model to use the c.1041 movement.

and why the does the movement number begin with an "R" instead of the usual Omega format? Replacement Movement?

That I don't know, but your theory seems to be a reasonable and logical one. I would inquire with Omega Vintage Information for clarification.

Here's the watch:

Looks a little on the polished side, but no more than mine (f
.............

irst portal above)...

And a couple of pics of the movement:

Yeow! I have a 23" Apple Cinema Display and it screams "No Mas!" to a 2800+ pixel scan. Seriously, anthing more than about 1000 pixels wide is overkill on forums. Try to crop anything larger.

That's better.

It looks ok to my eyes. I don't have an explanation for the "R" serial number, but I don't see anything untoward.

Hope this helps.

-- Chuck

Chuck Maddox

Chronographs, like most finer things in life, only improve with time...
Watch Article index: http://www.xnet.com/~cmaddox/cm3articles.html,
Watch Links Page: http://www.xnet.com/~cmaddox/watch.html,
Watch Blog: http://chuckmaddoxwatch.blogspot.com/.

Current Position
Chronocentric and zOwie site design and contents (c) Copyright 1998-2005, Derek Ziglar; Copyright 2005-2008, Jeffrey M. Stein. All rights reserved. Use of this web site constitutes acceptance of the terms of use. CONTACT | TERMS OF USE | TRANSLATE