The largest independent, non-commercial, consumer-oriented resource on the Internet for owners, collectors and enthusiasts of fine wristwatches. Online since 1998.
Informational Websites ChronoMaddox -- the legacy of Chuck Maddox OnTheDash -- vintage Heuer website Zowie -- Omega information
Discussion Forums ChronoMaddox Forum Heuer Forum Omega Forum
Counterfeit Watchers ChronoTools Forum ChronoTrader Forum

zOwie Omega Discussion Forum

Opened July 1999, zOwie is the Internet's first and longest running discussion forum dedicated to Omega brand watches.

Feel free to discuss pricing and specific dealers. But 'for sale' postings, commercial solicitation and ads are not allowed. Full archive of all messages is accessible through options in the Search and Preferences features. Privacy, policies and administrivia are covered in the Terms of Use.

For the answer to the NUMBER #1 most frequently asked question here--for details or value of a specific older Omega watch you have--go to: Tell Me About My Omega. Learn more about How To Include Photos and HTML In Your Postings. To contact someone with a question not relevant to other readers of the forum, please click on their email address and contact them privately.

It could be a typo.
In Response To: Re: New 1976 Brochure online ()


Hi Fabrizio,

That's an interesting question that you raise. I have another German catalogue from 1984 that clearly refers to it as the MK IV

So, according to the brochures, in 1976 it was the MK V, 8 years later it was the MK IV. But it was marked niether & there are speedmasters marked MK IV & MK V.

I think the MK 4.5 nickname is a GREAT name for the watch.

I have argued for quite a while that this watch CAN be called a MK IV ( due to the above scan ), now we could argue that it is also a MK V ...

But it's neither. It's the MK 4.5 !

My OPINION is that, in 1976, Omega already had a MK IV so they called it the MK V ( but didn't put anything on the dial ).

In 1983/84 they developed the Teutonic MK V & realized that they COULDN'T call it the MK VI ( since no watch had been made with MK V on the dial ). So, since the real MK IV was now out of prodution & it looked similar, they referred to it as the MK IV.

At the time it was quite a clever solution. Remember this is long before the Internet & fans like us who look at every small detail. At the time I don't suppose too many people worldwide would have noticed ( or cared )

Current Position
Chronocentric and zOwie site design and contents (c) Copyright 1998-2005, Derek Ziglar; Copyright 2005-2008, Jeffrey M. Stein. All rights reserved. Use of this web site constitutes acceptance of the terms of use. CONTACT | TERMS OF USE | TRANSLATE