The largest independent, non-commercial, consumer-oriented resource on the Internet for owners, collectors and enthusiasts of fine wristwatches. Online since 1998.
Informational Websites ChronoMaddox -- the legacy of Chuck Maddox OnTheDash -- vintage Heuer website Zowie -- Omega information
Discussion Forums ChronoMaddox Forum Heuer Forum Omega Forum
Counterfeit Watchers ChronoTools Forum ChronoTrader Forum

zOwie Omega Discussion Forum

Opened July 1999, zOwie is the Internet's first and longest running discussion forum dedicated to Omega brand watches.

Feel free to discuss pricing and specific dealers. But 'for sale' postings, commercial solicitation and ads are not allowed. Full archive of all messages is accessible through options in the Search and Preferences features. Privacy, policies and administrivia are covered in the Terms of Use.

For the answer to the NUMBER #1 most frequently asked question here--for details or value of a specific older Omega watch you have--go to: Tell Me About My Omega. Learn more about How To Include Photos and HTML In Your Postings. To contact someone with a question not relevant to other readers of the forum, please click on their email address and contact them privately.

Re: 8 October 2007 WSJ article
In Response To: 8 October 2007 WSJ article ()

[quote]

Quote:

Originally Posted by Hewybaby

I'm disappointed, unsurprised and more than a little angry. But as I have said . . .

About which part? TZ Moderator Harshness [Using Sam's phraseology]? Omega buying items at the auction? Omega Bidding up prices on other lots? Omega seemingly trying to prime their economic engine at both ends? Mr. Patrizzi's departure?

[/quote]

Pretty much an emotional reaction from a confirmed cynic and professional skeptic caught a bit by surprise . . . .

Disappointed I didn't anticipate Omega's actions more and better understand Antiquorum's motivations

Unsurprised at the fact they acted in the way they did once I understood

Angry at my naivety and the lack of transparency in the auction process by Antiquorum as compared to how it is practiced by older and more established houses

TZ moderator behavior and Patrizzi's departure are of little consequence to me, merely curiosity as to the timing

In some ways, the WSJ piece says a whole lot less than it implies.

By the way, in essence, Antiquorum is having an investigation of accounting irregularities. No one seems to have commented on that . . .

Messages In This Thread

8 October 2007 WSJ article
Re: 8 October 2007 WSJ article
Current Position
Chronocentric and zOwie site design and contents (c) Copyright 1998-2005, Derek Ziglar; Copyright 2005-2008, Jeffrey M. Stein. All rights reserved. Use of this web site constitutes acceptance of the terms of use. CONTACT | TERMS OF USE | TRANSLATE