The largest independent, non-commercial, consumer-oriented resource on the Internet for owners, collectors and enthusiasts of fine wristwatches. Online since 1998.
Informational Websites ChronoMaddox -- the legacy of Chuck Maddox OnTheDash -- vintage Heuer website Zowie -- Omega information
Discussion Forums ChronoMaddox Forum Heuer Forum Omega Forum
Counterfeit Watchers ChronoTools Forum ChronoTrader Forum

zOwie Omega Discussion Forum

Opened July 1999, zOwie is the Internet's first and longest running discussion forum dedicated to Omega brand watches.

Feel free to discuss pricing and specific dealers. But 'for sale' postings, commercial solicitation and ads are not allowed. Full archive of all messages is accessible through options in the Search and Preferences features. Privacy, policies and administrivia are covered in the Terms of Use.

For the answer to the NUMBER #1 most frequently asked question here--for details or value of a specific older Omega watch you have--go to: Tell Me About My Omega. Learn more about How To Include Photos and HTML In Your Postings. To contact someone with a question not relevant to other readers of the forum, please click on their email address and contact them privately.

Re: Your Omega is older than you think

[quote=John Rochowicz;522660]Omega has always claimed in the past that COSC certificates are kept on file for 4-5 years. After that it's too late. I'm a bit puzzled why #1 on your list cannot be obtained. Caliber 2500C didn't debut until the end of 2004, so the movement couldn't have been tested more than 3 years ago. [/quote]

Well, I could be wrong on the 2500C. Maybe its a 2500B. ( It was) I haven't had the watch open, but it seemed to be 7 beats a second and not 8. I will get my friendly neighborhood Tourneau to put it on the timing machine and tell me.

But if Omega introduced the 2500C in 2004, that probably means they had sent watches to COSC for some time previously.

I'm puzzled about a lot of things with Omega these days. We have one instance (with a photo of the chronometer certificate) of an 80 million serial number from 2001 (not a co-axial) in the sticky at the top of the forum! [this is referencing another watch forum] Last time I checked 2001 is not equal to 2006!

Watch #1 would have to have been COSCed in 2002 or before if it is 5 years. So it took three years to make it into a watch, so now its 2005. It sat at an AD for two years before I snatched it up. I guess that's plausible. It makes me wonder if it is due for a service!

I guess that's why Omega has been so slippery on the service intervals for the co-axial. If the watch is going to be 5 years old by the time you buy it, saying it needs service in 3 years puts it right at the 8 years they originally talked about!

Current Position
Chronocentric and zOwie site design and contents (c) Copyright 1998-2005, Derek Ziglar; Copyright 2005-2008, Jeffrey M. Stein. All rights reserved. Use of this web site constitutes acceptance of the terms of use. CONTACT | TERMS OF USE | TRANSLATE