The largest independent, non-commercial, consumer-oriented resource on the Internet for owners, collectors and enthusiasts of fine wristwatches. Online since 1998. | ||||||||
|
||||||||
|
Vintage Heuer Discussion Forum
The place for discussing 1930-1985 Heuer wristwatches, chronographs and dash-mounted timepieces. Online since May 2003. | |||||||
| |||||||
|
Hi Jody.
I'm by no means an expert on the post-merger watches, other than knowing a bit about the Classics range. But I figure the same approach to validating a vintage Heuer should work for a TAG-Heuer too.
I can't be as definitive as I might be on a vintage watch but this throws up a number of red flags to me. I had a look through my TH catalogues but I don't have anything going back as far as this. A poke round the net turned up some info though:
- W in a TAG-Heuer watch code indicates a watch only. Chronographs start with a C. I'm not 100% sure if this was always the case, but it is nowadays as far as I can tell.
- The WG5114 code is for a Sport Elegance watch (aka S/el) - this is what the Link series was called from 1987 before it was named Link in 1999, so doesn't have "Link" wording on the dial. It is a watch only (no chrono functions) with a blue face - doing an item and description search worldwide on eBay will turn one up at the moment and that one looks like all the other examples turned up by Google.
- The Calibre 36 movement is a high quality genuine chronograph. In its Link application (do the same eBay search but for CT511B), it has registers for perpetual seconds, 30 minute and 12 hour capacities. It would make no sense whatsoever not to use it for a proper chrono - having non-functional chrono dials or dials for month and day is quite common on fake watches, I'm afraid. The Cal 36 movement adds considerably to the value of the watch, and thus makes it desirable to add to the dial if the watch is not genuine.
- The Link watches are fairly commonly faked. One way of telling is that the links are often a solid piece in the fake, unlike the real bracelets, which have two separate parts - giving a lot of articulation, a comfortable watch and the series its name.
Photos always help, but without them, I'd have to conclude that the watch is an attempted replica of a Link CT511B mated with an earlier caseback (possibly also not genuine). I hope you haven't sunk any money into it yet. The eBay search for CT511B should give you an idea of what you'd need to pay for a Link Cal 36 - it's by no means a cheap watch and anything that seems too good to be true probably isn't true after all.
Hope this was of some help!
Chronocentric and zOwie site design and contents (c) Copyright 1998-2005, Derek Ziglar; Copyright 2005-2008, Jeffrey M. Stein. All rights reserved. Use of this web site constitutes acceptance of the terms of use. | CONTACT | TERMS OF USE | TRANSLATE |