++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++

: Hello Jeff, I do agree that the format is already the right one and
: that a simple, neat classification of the watch conditions (4
: levels as you suggest)would be the only changes to the table
: format.
: I am 100% with you also as for the idea of 'expanding' the list:
: here I think we might be a little bolder even.
: Since there are a few regulars here why not try to cover a greater
: number of models? The current list is a descending one in terms
: of value, but of course a lot of the commoner models out there
: may not ever make it. So I thought that, at least for those
: models where the market is or has been deep enough, providing a
: estimate even if the value is low can be of great help.
: It could be a simpler form than for the ABC segments, say one
: median value only as we have now for the current version.
: Still all those Viceroys, Pasadenas, 510.50x etc. would then be
: assigned a ballpark value to help the neophyte or anyway the one
: not so expert on that particular model line. Certainly a line
: would have to be drawn somewhere, but it would be easy: e.g.
: include all the ones that have been officially given pictures in
: the OdT gallery (save the 'very early' ones of 1930's etc.)
: Of course this would mean a much greater effort, but as a group
: this effort could be split among different people: I would be
: more than happy to help, for one. And I am sure most of us
: would, as we already do when a spot quotation is requested.
: Just an idea, of course, my 2c.
: Cheers.
: Fabrizio