The largest independent, non-commercial, consumer-oriented resource on the Internet for owners, collectors and enthusiasts of fine wristwatches. Online since 1998.
Informational Websites ChronoMaddox -- the legacy of Chuck Maddox OnTheDash -- vintage Heuer website Zowie -- Omega information
Discussion Forums ChronoMaddox Forum Heuer Forum Omega Forum
Counterfeit Watchers ChronoTools Forum ChronoTrader Forum

zOwie Omega Discussion Forum

Opened July 1999, zOwie is the Internet's first and longest running discussion forum dedicated to Omega brand watches.

Feel free to discuss pricing and specific dealers. But 'for sale' postings, commercial solicitation and ads are not allowed. Full archive of all messages is accessible through options in the Search and Preferences features. Privacy, policies and administrivia are covered in the Terms of Use.

For the answer to the NUMBER #1 most frequently asked question here--for details or value of a specific older Omega watch you have--go to: Tell Me About My Omega. Learn more about How To Include Photos and HTML In Your Postings. To contact someone with a question not relevant to other readers of the forum, please click on their email address and contact them privately.

I guess experiences differ as mine with Rolex was

Quite different....

My first new from a dealer piece of theirs, an Explorer, had material under the crystal and a dial with a poor lume application. Took it back to my dealer who sent it to Rolex and they replaced the dial but ruined the watch in the process, sent a letter to Rolex Geneve who forwarded it to Rolex NY US and the service manager Gregory Kraff called me, they agreed to service the piece again and would pay my costs for shipping....well they serviced it but this time they again left material on the dial and also they over polished the case...and they never bothered to refund my shipping.

I figured it was a fluke because of all the pro Rolex propoganda I read on various forums and decided to give them another go....sold the Explorer for a pretty good loss considering age and condition and picked up a new Submariner from another dealer for a measely 5% discount...came to notice later on this one that one of the links was over polished, as was one of the lugs, and the clasp was put together ever so incorrectly...nothing major but still for a watch costing 4.5K and with their marketing it isn't what one expects....wrote Rolex NY direct this time expressing my frustration. Gregory Kraff wrote back again saying that it was too bad that I wasn't happy with their product, I should have been more discerning at the time of purchase, and that these flaws were common, normal, and to be expected in Rolex...his suggestion was to be more careful when buying....

I have heard of others having awful and or rude treatment from Rolex NY...wheras with Omega their vintage service in bienne will actually work on a piece wheras Rolex tells you to buy new if it is too old...and with Omega you always have the option of email contact and or Bienne, with Rolex you get one of the three US dealers or the highway.

I've owned three Rolex pieces and I'll be hard pressed to ever buy another.

Messages In This Thread

Co-axial technology, a bad coice after all!
Re: Co-axial technology, a bad coice after all!
Re: Co-axial technology, a bad coice after all!
Re: Co-axial technology, a bad coice after all!
I always have to question the logic
Re: Co-axial technology, a bad coice after all!
Some comments
The Co-Axial Is Fine...
Re: The Co-Axial Is Fine...
Re: The Co-Axial Is Fine...
Re: The Co-Axial Is Fine...
Re: The Co-Axial Is Fine...
Re: The Co-Axial Is Fine...
Re: The Co-Axial Is Fine...
Re: The Co-Axial Is Fine...
I can't agree with this statement
Re: I can't agree with this statement
As do all other brands
ADMIN! OK Guys. it's time for me to step in :-(
Re: The Co-Axial Is Fine...
You're A Troll....
coaxial is too new to be judged as fully fine
Re: coaxial is too new to be judged as fully fine
Doubt the Co-Ax to blame, it's probably the c.3313
more thoughts and agreements
Thoughts, some agreements and disagreements...
Re: Doubt the Co-Ax to blame, it's probably the c.
Re: Doubt the Co-Ax to blame, it's probably the c.
I guess experiences differ as mine with Rolex was
Re: I guess experiences differ as mine with Rolex
Thanks Tim, honestly
Re: Thanks Tim, honestly
Thanks tim, good to see others with
No Problem
Hey Tim, sounds like we are on the same page
Absolutely
Agree
Service after sale comment
the price of the rolex and co-axial
I guess it is all subjective but personally
Re: the price of the rolex and co-axial
And another comment (A little long)
I agree with this 100% Cajun
I agree Cajun, possibly if
some thoughts
As usual Georges I will have to disagree
Re: As usual Georges I will have to disagree
And we continue to disagree....
Re: And we continue to disagree....
and again
It means to direct, concise and to the point...
chuck is right at 100%
Current Position
Chronocentric and zOwie site design and contents (c) Copyright 1998-2005, Derek Ziglar; Copyright 2005-2008, Jeffrey M. Stein. All rights reserved. Use of this web site constitutes acceptance of the terms of use. CONTACT | TERMS OF USE | TRANSLATE