zOwie Omega Discussion Forum

Opened July 1999, zOwie is the Internet's first and longest running discussion forum dedicated to Omega brand watches.

Feel free to discuss pricing and specific dealers. But 'for sale' postings, commercial solicitation and ads are not allowed. Full archive of all messages is accessible through options in the Search and Preferences features. Privacy, policies and administrivia are covered in the Terms of Use.

For the answer to the NUMBER #1 most frequently asked question here--for details or value of a specific older Omega watch you have--go to: Tell Me About My Omega.

Learn more about How To Include Photos and HTML In Your Postings.

To contact someone with a question not relevant to other readers of the forum, please click on their email address and contact them privately.

Forgot your Password? RSS

Return to Index Read Responses

70s chronograph technical question

(WARNING--Omega-bashing content)

Just want to get an evaluation of this statement re: 1970s chronograph movements from a source that will remain anonymous:

"Do you want to get technical on the 1970s Omega movements--let me know. For starters, one should look at the [chronograph] function caliber parts. The re-setting strikers are poorly designed, as well as the use of brass bushing instead of jewels at critical pressure points.

As you tear down the caliber you will be shocked to find plastic and gap-filling inserts nestled away. Please tear down any 1970s Omega chronograph movement and you will see how cheaply they are made. The 727 and 234 Valjoux looks like a [Patek] movement compared to the 1970s Omega chronograph calibers. Do not get me started on the balance and hairspring quality on the Omega caliber."

What is the consensus on this analysis--sound or BS?
TIA & HAGWE,
Tom