The largest independent, non-commercial, consumer-oriented resource on the Internet for owners, collectors and enthusiasts of fine wristwatches. Online since 1998.
Informational Websites ChronoMaddox -- the legacy of Chuck Maddox OnTheDash -- vintage Heuer website Zowie -- Omega information
Discussion Forums ChronoMaddox Forum Heuer Forum Omega Forum
Counterfeit Watchers ChronoTools Forum ChronoTrader Forum

zOwie Omega Discussion Forum

Opened July 1999, zOwie is the Internet's first and longest running discussion forum dedicated to Omega brand watches.

Co-axial technology, a bad coice after all!
By:Khalid M. Nabulsi
Date: 6/21/06 08:10 GMT

I bought a brand new Constellation double eagle chronograph. The watch stopped after a couple of days and was serviced by the agent. A couple of days later the watch stopped again. The watch was then sent back to switzerland for repair. The watch is with them for almost three months with no resolution as to this point. I am frustrated because I spent a hefty amount on what supposed to be the best of OMEGA watches and yet have to go through this bad experience. so next time if you are planninmg to go for that dont think twice, but trice since you might go through the same experience. For the records, I bought the watch 6 months ago, stayed with me for three weeks only and the rest it was with the agent and the service center in switzerland. Does any one have an idea how to pressure the Company to reimbuse me for the price of the watch.

Regards

Messages In This Thread

Co-axial technology, a bad coice after all! -- Khalid M. Nabulsi -- 6/21/06 08:10 GMT
Re: Co-axial technology, a bad coice after all! -- Carlos -- 12/19/06 05:17 GMT
Re: Co-axial technology, a bad coice after all! -- Felix -- 12/20/06 09:05 GMT
I always have to question the logic -- Mathew J -- 12/21/06 04:16 GMT
Re: Co-axial technology, a bad coice after all! -- Jeff -- 12/20/06 22:32 GMT
Some comments -- CajunMike -- 12/19/06 18:29 GMT
The Co-Axial Is Fine... -- John Rochowicz -- 6/21/06 19:19 GMT
Re: The Co-Axial Is Fine... -- Pieter Claassen -- 12/18/06 10:48 GMT
Re: The Co-Axial Is Fine... -- Felix -- 12/20/06 09:05 GMT
Re: The Co-Axial Is Fine... -- John Rochowicz -- 12/18/06 14:56 GMT
Re: The Co-Axial Is Fine... -- Barney -- 4/26/09 14:48 GMT
Re: The Co-Axial Is Fine... -- Pieter Claassen -- 12/19/06 08:19 GMT
Re: The Co-Axial Is Fine... -- Omari -- 12/20/06 17:46 GMT
Re: The Co-Axial Is Fine... -- Carlos -- 12/20/06 01:04 GMT
I can't agree with this statement -- SteveW62 -- 12/20/06 12:23 GMT
Re: I can't agree with this statement -- Felix -- 12/20/06 13:51 GMT
As do all other brands -- CajunMike -- 12/20/06 07:51 GMT
ADMIN! OK Guys. it's time for me to step in :-( -- SteveW62 -- 12/19/06 15:59 GMT
Re: The Co-Axial Is Fine... -- Jason Sanders -- 12/19/06 15:27 GMT
You're A Troll.... -- John Rochowicz -- 12/19/06 15:19 GMT
coaxial is too new to be judged as fully fine -- georges zaslavsky -- 6/22/06 09:22 GMT
Re: coaxial is too new to be judged as fully fine -- John Rochowicz -- 6/22/06 17:54 GMT
Doubt the Co-Ax to blame, it's probably the c.3313 -- Chicagoland Chuck Maddox -- 6/21/06 13:26 GMT
more thoughts and agreements -- georges zaslavsky -- 6/22/06 09:41 GMT
Thoughts, some agreements and disagreements... -- Chicagoland Chuck Maddox -- 6/22/06 14:48 GMT
Re: Doubt the Co-Ax to blame, it's probably the c. -- Aage Johansen -- 6/21/06 19:43 GMT
Re: Doubt the Co-Ax to blame, it's probably the c. -- a jacobs -- 12/22/06 05:51 GMT
I guess experiences differ as mine with Rolex was -- Mathew J -- 12/23/06 04:07 GMT
Re: I guess experiences differ as mine with Rolex -- Tim -- 1/8/07 23:53 GMT
Thanks Tim, honestly -- Mathew J -- 1/9/07 02:22 GMT
Re: Thanks Tim, honestly -- Tim -- 1/9/07 11:45 GMT
Thanks tim, good to see others with -- Mathew J -- 1/9/07 19:20 GMT
No Problem -- Tim -- 1/10/07 12:27 GMT
Hey Tim, sounds like we are on the same page -- Mathew J -- 1/11/07 02:27 GMT
Absolutely -- Tim -- 1/11/07 17:00 GMT
Agree -- Felix -- 1/11/07 13:04 GMT
Service after sale comment -- CajunMike -- 12/22/06 20:56 GMT
the price of the rolex and co-axial -- a jacobs -- 12/24/06 13:51 GMT
I guess it is all subjective but personally -- Mathew J -- 12/29/06 03:56 GMT
Re: the price of the rolex and co-axial -- John Rochowicz -- 12/27/06 03:40 GMT
And another comment (A little long) -- CajunMike -- 12/26/06 02:15 GMT
I agree with this 100% Cajun -- Mathew J -- 12/29/06 04:04 GMT
I agree Cajun, possibly if -- Mathew J -- 12/23/06 04:12 GMT
some thoughts -- georges zaslavsky -- 12/25/06 12:04 GMT
As usual Georges I will have to disagree -- Mathew J -- 12/29/06 03:52 GMT
Re: As usual Georges I will have to disagree -- georges zaslavsky -- 12/29/06 10:33 GMT
And we continue to disagree.... -- Mathew J -- 12/29/06 14:49 GMT
Re: And we continue to disagree.... -- georges zaslavsky -- 12/29/06 23:12 GMT
and again -- Mathew J -- 12/30/06 04:27 GMT
It means to direct, concise and to the point... -- Chicagoland Chuck Maddox -- 6/22/06 14:10 GMT
chuck is right at 100% -- georges zaslavsky -- 6/22/06 09:44 GMT
Chronocentric and zOwie site design and contents (c) Copyright 1998-2005, Derek Ziglar; Copyright 2005-2009, Jeffrey M. Stein. All rights reserved. Use of this web site constitutes acceptance of the terms of use. CONTACT | TERMS OF USE | TRANSLATE