The largest independent, non-commercial, consumer-oriented resource on the Internet for owners, collectors and enthusiasts of fine wristwatches. Online since 1998. | ||||||||
|
||||||||
|
Feel free to discuss pricing and specific dealers. But 'for sale' postings, commercial solicitation and ads are not allowed. Full archive of all messages is accessible through options in the Search and Preferences features. Privacy, policies and administrivia are covered in the Terms of Use.
For the answer to the NUMBER #1 most frequently asked question here--for details or value of a specific older Omega watch you have--go to: Tell Me About My Omega. | Learn more about How To Include Photos and HTML In Your Postings. | To contact someone with a question not relevant to other readers of the forum, please click on their email address and contact them privately. |
I agree. I was showing the watch to my friend and he commented that the face design looks neat and he said he thought it looked kind of, 'aquatic'. It's a nice touch and certainly one of the better looking watches out there (up close and from a distance) in my opinion.
: Nah, then it would look like an ordinary watch.
: The wave pattern is Omega's unique
: characteristic for their Seamaster line. It
: adds a level of distinction and sets it
: apart from other watches.
: You can get a plain watch anywhere. But how few
: watchmakers do something visually
: interesting with the dial?
Chronocentric and zOwie site design and contents (c) Copyright 1998-2005, Derek Ziglar; Copyright 2005-2008, Jeffrey M. Stein. All rights reserved. Use of this web site constitutes acceptance of the terms of use. | CONTACT | TERMS OF USE | TRANSLATE |