zOwie Omega Discussion Forum

Opened July 1999, zOwie is the Internet's first and longest running discussion forum dedicated to Omega brand watches.

Feel free to discuss pricing and specific dealers. But 'for sale' postings, commercial solicitation and ads are not allowed. Full archive of all messages is accessible through options in the Search and Preferences features. Privacy, policies and administrivia are covered in the Terms of Use.

For the answer to the NUMBER #1 most frequently asked question here--for details or value of a specific older Omega watch you have--go to: Tell Me About My Omega.

Learn more about How To Include Photos and HTML In Your Postings.

To contact someone with a question not relevant to other readers of the forum, please click on their email address and contact them privately.

Forgot your Password? RSS

Return to Index Read Responses

The differences shouldn't be a deciding issue

In Response To: Comparing Movements ()

The Cal 1128 is based on the 1120. I'm sure it's more complex, but that doesn't necessarily mean it will cost more to service, or be less reliable. I find the Date Setting to be only slightly more inconvenient than the Quick Date Set on the 1120. Unless you go for weeks without wearing it, you shouldn't have to go far with it. It can also be rolled forward or backward. Like the 1120, the date can be set without hacking the minutes and seconds. If you wear the watch on a regular basis, you will probably only have to roll it forward a day or two a few times a year.

Messages In This Thread

Comparing Movements

The differences shouldn't be a deciding issue

Forgot your Password? RSS

Return to Index Read Responses

1 wallclock secs ( 0.16 usr + 0.03 sys = 0.19 CPU)