The largest independent, non-commercial, consumer-oriented resource on the Internet for owners, collectors and enthusiasts of fine wristwatches. Online since 1998.
Informational Websites ChronoMaddox -- the legacy of Chuck Maddox OnTheDash -- vintage Heuer website Zowie -- Omega information
Discussion Forums ChronoMaddox Forum Heuer Forum Omega Forum
Counterfeit Watchers ChronoTools Forum ChronoTrader Forum

zOwie Omega Discussion Forum

Opened July 1999, zOwie is the Internet's first and longest running discussion forum dedicated to Omega brand watches.

Feel free to discuss pricing and specific dealers. But 'for sale' postings, commercial solicitation and ads are not allowed. Full archive of all messages is accessible through options in the Search and Preferences features. Privacy, policies and administrivia are covered in the Terms of Use.

For the answer to the NUMBER #1 most frequently asked question here--for details or value of a specific older Omega watch you have--go to: Tell Me About My Omega. Learn more about How To Include Photos and HTML In Your Postings. To contact someone with a question not relevant to other readers of the forum, please click on their email address and contact them privately.

Re: Seamaster losing prestige
In Response To: Seamaster losing prestige ()

: This of course is due to James
: Bond movies and the option of picking quartz
: movement which can make this watch under a
: 1k, therefore just about anyone is buying
: this watch. It’s sad but I have seen the
: Seamaster even in Costco at discounted
: prices. So the question remains- has the
: Seamaster become a relatively inexpensive
: mainstream theme watch for the masses?

I just don't see it around very much at all. I don't think most people pay that much for a watch, even discounted at Costco for around $850. I've seen the watch there (I can't remember the exact price since I was on a Rolex fixation back then :), but the serial numbers are polished off. I don't mind gray market dealers, but I won't buy a defaced watch. If you're going to break the rules, have the guts to admit it and leave the numbers on. It's not like they're fooling anyone anyways since the number is inside also. As for it being mainstream for the masses, it would be, if the watch was around $100. With $799 the lowest I've seen (Quartz model, gray market dealer and no serial numbers), this doesn't qualify.

Current Position
Chronocentric and zOwie site design and contents (c) Copyright 1998-2005, Derek Ziglar; Copyright 2005-2008, Jeffrey M. Stein. All rights reserved. Use of this web site constitutes acceptance of the terms of use. CONTACT | TERMS OF USE | TRANSLATE