The largest independent, non-commercial, consumer-oriented resource on the Internet for owners, collectors and enthusiasts of fine wristwatches. Online since 1998.
Informational Websites ChronoMaddox -- the legacy of Chuck Maddox OnTheDash -- vintage Heuer website Zowie -- Omega information
Discussion Forums ChronoMaddox Forum Heuer Forum Omega Forum
Counterfeit Watchers ChronoTools Forum ChronoTrader Forum

zOwie Omega Discussion Forum

Opened July 1999, zOwie is the Internet's first and longest running discussion forum dedicated to Omega brand watches.

Feel free to discuss pricing and specific dealers. But 'for sale' postings, commercial solicitation and ads are not allowed. Full archive of all messages is accessible through options in the Search and Preferences features. Privacy, policies and administrivia are covered in the Terms of Use.

For the answer to the NUMBER #1 most frequently asked question here--for details or value of a specific older Omega watch you have--go to: Tell Me About My Omega. Learn more about How To Include Photos and HTML In Your Postings. To contact someone with a question not relevant to other readers of the forum, please click on their email address and contact them privately.

Logic isn't really the purpose here...

: Well.....can't say i agree with you on this
: one. Why creat and continue to market a
: watch that has a feature nobody ever uses?

I think it is mostly marketing differentiation. While we collectors and experts might know the difference, remember that 98% of luxury watch buyers are Average Joes who are easily swayed by trivial or seemingly-important differences. This one has a COSC certification -- so it "must" be better on accuracy. This one has a HRV, so it "must" be the better diving watch. This one costs more, so it "must" be the better investment.

All of these are emotional reactions to the attributes -- because buyers seldom have enough information to make a truly clear, logical, informed choice. Otherwise, they would be aware that the COSC standard of perfection is fairly mediocre and severely outdated, that the HRV really is as useful as 'teats on a bull' and that price alone is not a reliable measure of value in luxury items.

Current Position
Chronocentric and zOwie site design and contents (c) Copyright 1998-2005, Derek Ziglar; Copyright 2005-2008, Jeffrey M. Stein. All rights reserved. Use of this web site constitutes acceptance of the terms of use. CONTACT | TERMS OF USE | TRANSLATE